| Title: | MAPI Driver for ALL-IN-1 and Office Server |
| Notice: | See Note 6.19 for V1 SSB Kit Pointer |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Fri Nov 17 1995 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 125 |
| Total number of notes: | 506 |
When is the next version of the MAPI driver (with support for Outlook) expected to be available ? I realise it's going into field test next month. Will it support the ALL-IN-1 autoforward and autoreply features ? What support will it provide for Outlook scheduling - (1) storage of schedule data in the ALL-IN-1 file cabinet ? (2) free and busy schedule ? (3) notifications ? Thanks, Bill.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 122.1 | IOSG::MAURICE | Back in the egg | Wed Apr 23 1997 16:11 | 24 | |
Hi,
> When is the next version of the MAPI driver (with support for Outlook)
> expected to be available ? I realise it's going into field test next month.
We don't have an official date yet, but some time this summer.
> Will it support the ALL-IN-1 autoforward and autoreply features ?
Currently unlikely.
> What support will it provide for Outlook scheduling -
> (1) storage of schedule data in the ALL-IN-1 file cabinet ?
> (2) free and busy schedule ?
> (3) notifications ?
We're not planning to provide these. The user who is running with the
Exchange Server as the default message store, and the MAPI Driver as a
secondary store, will be able to do these naturally. Otherwise the user
will be restricted to using Personal Folders.
Cheers
Stuart
| |||||
| 122.2 | What version of RTF is used ? | SIOG::rasmodem2.dbo.dec.com::dub03::b_rafferty | Wed Apr 23 1997 19:43 | 7 | |
Thanks for the quick response. What version of RTF (Microsoft RTF V6.0 ?) does the driver convert WPSPLUS to ? Thanks, Bill. | |||||
| 122.3 | IOSG::MAURICE | Back in the egg | Thu Apr 24 1997 11:48 | 10 | |
Hi,
I don't actually know! We just call the MasterSoft converter, and the
documentation I have doesn't specify a version. From a look at the file
produced the header starts with "{\rtf1\ansi". Is this enough of a clue
to the version?
Cheers
Stuart
| |||||