| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 191.1 | | STAR::LEWIS | | Thu Feb 13 1997 09:10 | 3 |
| Well, Forrest would know the precise answer, but I'm pretty sure
it's not 115200. More like 19200, last I heard.
Sue Lewis
|
| 191.2 | | BSS::JILSON | WFH in the Chemung River Valley | Thu Feb 13 1997 11:05 | 6 |
| The hardware supports 115200 but you will have to see if the driver for the
port supports it.
WRKSYS::ALPHASTATION 1552.1
Jilly
|
| 191.3 | Console Ports Traditionally Not Good At High-Volume | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Thu Feb 13 1997 13:08 | 8 |
|
You probably don't want to use the com ports -- and particularly not
the console port -- for high-volume traffic or networking.
Be aware that some of the com ports `fake' the higher baud rates,
by sending the individual characters at the faster speed, but with
an increase in the inter-character spacing. In this design, the
aggregate throughput of the port doesn't increase.
|
| 191.4 | 19.2K is the official limit | STAR::KENNEY | | Wed Feb 19 1997 23:42 | 6 |
|
The official limit is 19.2K. The code as of V7.0 will let you set
speeds up to 57.6K.
forrest
|