| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 685.1 |  | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Thu May 15 1997 20:14 | 1 | 
|  | 	Incremental,  to check just use the -vvv option.
 | 
| 685.2 | Maybe not? | SANITY::LEMONS | And we thank you for your support. | Wed May 21 1997 08:55 | 13 | 
|  |     On our system running NetWorker Server for Digital UNIX V4.3 SSB, I did
    a 'man mminfo', and read:
    
    "The level is only  kept  for  scheduled saves and file migration; save
    sets generated by explicitly running the save(8) command (called ad hoc
    saves) do not have an associated level."
    
    So, which is it:  incremental or no level?
    
    Thanks, and sorry to question this; it's very important for a cloning
    process I'm writing to know this.
    
    tl
 | 
| 685.3 |  | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Wed May 21 1997 09:16 | 8 | 
|  | 	As stated in the man page is it not either.  A manual save
	will save all requested files, period.  This can not be
	considered a full since only some of the files may have been
	selected on the save command.  An ad-hoc save is just that,
	a few files saved in addtion to the normal saves.  If the
	files have changed since the last incremental and are saved
	via an ad-hoc manual save, they will still be saved by the
	next incremental even though they are already on tape.
 | 
| 685.4 |  | SANITY::LEMONS | And we thank you for your support. | Wed May 21 1997 09:21 | 5 | 
|  |     Thakns, Roger.  According to the manual 'save -l' can be used to
    specify a level, which (I guess) will force the saveset to be marked
    with the appropriate level.  Is this true?  Any gotchas?
    
    tl
 | 
| 685.5 |  | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Wed May 21 1997 10:34 | 3 | 
|  | 	You seem to have more time to find these things out then
	we do.  You already have more practice at expanding this
	products capability than anybody in our group.
 | 
| 685.6 | Roger's is testy due to lack of sleep  :-)  :-) | DECWET::EVANS | NSR Engineering | Wed May 21 1997 11:47 | 5 | 
|  | It's that silly Scalability Day Thing...  :-) :-)
Terry -- yeah, using -l <level> will do what you want. It just won't 
 remember that level from one run to another... but that's why you use a
 script, right!  :-)
 |