| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 556.1 |  | DECWET::CARRUTHERS | Life gets easier when you realize you can't have everything. | Mon Apr 07 1997 09:32 | 5 | 
|  | We asked Legato this same question several months ago and 
they assured us that NetWorker was Y2K compliant.
I looked for the email, but could not find it.  If I do
and it is not confidential, I will post it here.
 | 
| 556.2 | Year 2000 -- Statement of support | DECWET::CARRUTHERS | Life gets easier when you realize you can't have everything. | Mon Apr 07 1997 09:36 | 48 | 
|  |                <<< DECWET::DOCD$:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DECNSR.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< DECnsr >-
=============================================================================
===
Note 2252.2             Year 2000 -- Statement of support                 2
of 2
DECWET::ONO "The Wrong Stuff"                        38 lines  14-OCT-1996
15:33
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Legato has issued a year 2000 compliance statement.  The text is 
reproduced here.  You may also obtain this compliance statement 
via Legato's fax-on-demand system at 415.812.6156, document 1006.
Note that this notice pertains to Legato's products.  Digital has 
not yet issued a year 2000 compliance statement for its NetWorker 
products.
Wes
[LEGATO LOGO]
Year 2000 Compliance Statement
The Legato NetWorker product family fully supports dates in the 
year 2000 and beyond.  All internal dates are stored in an 
internal format that allows representation of dates from January 
1st, 1970 through December 31st, 2037.  NetWorker correctly 
interprets the year 2000 as a leap year.  NetWorker interprets 
two digit year specifications as follows:
	. A year entered in the range of 70-99 is interpreted as 
	  1970-1999
	. A year entered in the range of 00-37 is interpreted as 
	  2000-2037
	. A year entered in the range of 38-69 is invalid
The compliance statement applies to the following NetWorker 
products:
	. NetWorker for NetWare Release 3.12 and later
	. NetWorker for NetWare Release 4.0 and later
	. NetWorker for Windows NT, Release 4.2 and later
	. NetWorker for UNIX, Release 4.2 and later
	. All NetWorker ClientPaks
	. All NetWorker Database Modules and Toolkits
 | 
| 556.3 |  | KAHLUA::LEMONS | And we thank you for your support. | Mon Apr 07 1997 10:01 | 11 | 
|  |     Wes
    
    Thanks for posting this information; I'm glad to know that Legato's
    base is all set.
    
    "Digital has not yet issued a year 2000 compliance statement for its
    NetWorker products."
    
    I assume this is planned, but just wanted to ask to make sure.
    
    tl
 | 
| 556.4 | web site to check support status | DECWET::HUBER |  | Mon Apr 07 1997 10:17 | 5 | 
|  | I believe you'll find the infor you need if you look in the following web site:
www.digital.com/info/year2000.  The supported NetWorker products may be found
under the "Year2000/Millennium Software Product Status List".
-Craig
 | 
| 556.5 |  | KAHLUA::LEMONS | And we thank you for your support. | Mon Apr 07 1997 11:51 | 7 | 
|  |     Hi Craig
    
    Thanks for the pointer.  I didn't see any NetWorker products on that
    list, but I'll check back periodically.  It's possible that the name is
    so archane that my searches didn't find it.
    
    tl
 | 
| 556.6 | FIxing problems with web site ... | DECWET::HUBER |  | Wed Apr 09 1997 08:52 | 11 | 
|  | I checked also, on 8-April, and found problems seeing the
NetWorker info.  My contact in the DIGITAL group handling
Y2000 compliance issues tells me that there was a goof in
transferring the latest compliance info into the web page.
A much larger, more complete list should be up later today,
or by tomorrow.
Regards,
Craig
 | 
| 556.7 |  | SANITY::LEMONS | And we thank you for your support. | Thu Apr 10 1997 07:41 | 7 | 
|  |     Sure enough, a much longer list is there, with ~1 page of NetWorker
    items.  All have a 'B' status, indicating that they are already Y2K
    compliant, every one of them.  As long as the list is complete, all is
    well.
    
    Thanks
    tl
 |