| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 48.1 | Think its a known problem | DUNKLE::MCDERMOTT | Chris McDermott - Software Janitorial Services | Tue Feb 11 1997 18:36 | 4 | 
|  | I think that this is a known problem that is due to be fixed in V50E-ECO1.  I
also beleive that there is a patch available for it.  If you want the patch for
yourself or more information contact Dave Cook:  CPEEDY::COOK.  If you need that
patch for a customer they will need to submit an IPMT case.
 | 
| 48.2 |  | UTRTSC::SWEEP | I want a lolly... | Wed Feb 12 1997 09:13 | 7 | 
|  |     I don't think this is a server issue. All IRIS traces show that
    the client doesn't send a ULOGOFF. So how do we know we should
    get rid of the share.
    
    Paul only mentioned it as an info. message.
    
    Adrie
 | 
| 48.3 |  | DUNKLE::MCDERMOTT | Chris McDermott - Software Janitorial Services | Wed Feb 12 1997 16:35 | 19 | 
|  | >> >   We have seen this problem only with 3.11 redir (VREDIR) and only to a
>> >   pathworks server. 
 >   I don't think this is a server issue. All IRIS traces show that
 >   the client doesn't send a ULOGOFF. So how do we know we should
 >   get rid of the share.
 >   
 >   Paul only mentioned it as an info. message.
 >   
 >   Adrie
I think the problem is that the client has two sessions to the server: guest
(blank username) and the normal user both connected to the share.  The use/d is
disconnecting the guest from the share but not the normal user. 
Chris
 |