[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | SEAL | 
|  | 
| Moderator: | GALVIA::SMITH | 
|  | 
| Created: | Mon Mar 21 1994 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 1989 | 
| Total number of notes: | 8209 | 
What is a DMZ?
I used to understand what a DMZ was, in firewall terms.  It
used to be the red lan, didn't it?  That was reasonable when
access to that lan by packets was controlled from each side -
both the ISP router and the gate were screening what's trying
to get to that lan.
Nowadays, I think the term is useless because there's no common
meaning for the term across the industry.  The red lan is no
longer a DMZ in a single machine firewall, particularly if you
let everything hit the outside of the firewall.
I've seen the network connecting gatekeeper and gate in a two
node firewall called a DMZ.  I think that is valid, since 
absolutely nobody goes into that network.  But this doesn't
map onto the one node firewall.
I've seen green net called a DMZ.  I've even seen the immediate
blue lan called a DMZ, when this was simply a cable connecting
to a dozen internal routers to the real blue network.
So, what is a DMZ these days?  Is it still a useful term?
T
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1923.1 |  | CHEFS::16.42.4.226::hattos | I'm back - as a matter of fact | Sat Apr 26 1997 11:52 | 8 | 
|  | Tony,
I think that useful or not, DMZ is a term which has stuck.
I believe it to be the green net idea, but as you point out the others are 
possibly valid also.
Stu
 |