| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4343 |
| Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hi,
I have a customer who isn't able to select a Distribution List ..
He receives no error but when the operation ends the first distribution
list is still the one selected despite of his selection had been other
distribution list.
This happen with MDL option and with the users DL option too. I checked and
the forms called are DLSYS (in the case of MDL option) and DL (DL
option) ... Following the trace, I realized that in the "CHECK_DL"
option there are three lines :
;;~~CHECK_DL~~;; { in the DLSYS form named data }
get $distfolder = oa$_dlsys_folder \
mail dist_del $distname
if oa$status == 0 then oa$msg_purge \\ XOP "~~find_first_sysdl~~"
The correct distribution list is not selected because OA$STATUS is
always 0 ... The same happens with the DL form ... I customized
this form taking this line out and it worked .. but I can't understand
why this happens .. I have other customers with the same version
(3.0 Brazilian) and they don't have this problem.
Any ideas of what can be causing this wrong status ?
thks ... Marcia
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3828.1 | Duplicate names? | IOSG::MAURICE | I left my heart in Alcatraz | Fri Jan 28 1994 13:23 | 9 |
Hi,
Does the user by any chance have a Private Distribution List with the
same name as a System Distribution List? This would cause the symptom
you are seeing.
Cheers
Stuart
| |||||
| 3828.2 | info | VAXRIO::ABREU | Fri Jan 28 1994 17:00 | 13 | |
Hi Stuart ,
I made a test in the Manager account for example and I didn't have
any private DL ... I created one .. and the same happened .. The
distribution list have different names for sure. It's true that the
names of the system lists are similar but we don't have how to avoid it
because the name is composed by the departemnt , followed by numbers.
Anyway , Do you see any problems in not test the status after the "mail
dist_sel" function ? Do you think this similar names can be the cause
of the problem?
Thanks.. Marcia
| |||||
| 3828.3 | Known problem | IOSG::MAURICE | I left my heart in Alcatraz | Fri Jan 28 1994 17:37 | 10 |
Hi,
I looked at the code for the PFR and found that we have fixed a problem
where the function MAIL DIST_SEL sets OA$STATUS to 0 if it has selected
a System Distribution List. So I agree with your temporary workround of
removing the test of oa$status.
Cheers
Stuart
| |||||