| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 3644.1 | use the dsab | IOSG::TYLDESLEY |  | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:07 | 17 | 
|  |     Cb.
    >>> ..the script file which does the create details for the VMS  
    >>> account. At the very end it also issues a DCL command to invoke
    >>> authorize (not very elegant).
    ----
    This is the only way it could be done, because of the way the UAI$
    works. Scott, who wrote UAI$ will explain in more detail. I've
    forgotten right now.
    
    You do not need to use this 'inelegant' mechanism and the /flags
    qualifier, because you can: 
    <write change UAI$ username=#username, captive = "1"
    See Application Programming Ref Vol 1, page 7-123.
    
    Cheers
    DaveT
                               
 | 
| 3644.2 | I'm embarrased ... | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:33 | 14 | 
|  | >    
>    You do not need to use this 'inelegant' mechanism and the /flags
>    qualifier, because you can: 
>    <write change UAI$ username=#username, captive = "1"
>    See Application Programming Ref Vol 1, page 7-123.
I'm embarrased, and I guess I was a little lazy.
BTW, why does the sm_create_user_details script issua a dcl AUTHORIZE at the
end to set /PWDEXPIRED. Couldn't this have been doen via the DSAB as well.
Thanks,
Cb.
 | 
| 3644.3 | will do | IOSG::TYLDESLEY |  | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:59 | 12 | 
|  |     Hi Cb.
    No need to be embarassed - UAI$ docn. is a little hidden ;-)
    
    re sm_cr_user_details. At the time that this was converted to use UAI$,
    UAI$ did not support setting the password expired. This was added at a 
    later date and since that time we have not had the resource to make and
    test the change to use the dsab. (it's not a big fix, but it consumes 
    testers, PA etc.) I agree it would be nice to do, and will add it to my
    list of nice-to-do's... (need a new whiteboard!).
    
    Thanks for the reminder.
    DaveT
 | 
| 3644.4 | CAPTIVE works? | BIGMAC::KARPEL |  | Thu Jan 06 1994 19:03 | 4 | 
|  |     I thought I recalled a problem with the CAPTIVE flag and ALL-IN-1
    printing.  Don't you have to use RESTRICTED?
    
    TK
 | 
| 3644.5 | STARS says.... | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Atlanta's Most (In)famous Welshman | Thu Jan 06 1994 19:23 | 8 | 
|  |     CAPTIVE v RESTRICTED last discussed in note 2151 of the previous
    version of the conference.
    
    That note interestingly was posted by one Chaim Budnick!
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.wicks
 |