| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 3322.1 | Discussed more times than I can count to | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Tue Sep 28 1993 21:50 | 11 | 
|  |     Martin
    
    A dir or a search would show bunches of matches on this particularly
    the messy legal rubbish about not letting ALL-IN-1 v3.0 customers
    get their hands on CDA 2.0
    
    there's notes 2821, 1230, 2034, 1542 ... you get the idea!
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
 | 
| 3322.2 |  | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Ajax, last hope of Holland | Thu Sep 30 1993 08:53 | 9 | 
|  |     Hi,
    
    In Holland we decided that is it cheaper to just let
    that handfull of customers install 2.0 (most of them
    have CD's) than (re-)start policy/pricing discussions again and again.
    
    Regards,
    
    Jan
 | 
| 3322.3 |  | IOSG::BURTON | ALL-IN-1 Builder | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:26 | 8 | 
|  |     Jan,
    
    	I believe part of the problem specifically with CDA V2.0, is that
    Digital pay a royalty to a 3rd party for every licence sold.  Have you
    checked with the product manager (either for ALL-IN-1 or for CDA)
    whether your action has contravened whatever agreement is in force.
           
    Martin.
 | 
| 3322.4 |  | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Ajax, last hope of Holland | Fri Oct 01 1993 07:47 | 13 | 
|  |     Martin,
    
    >Digital pay a royalty to a 3rd party for every licence sold.  Have
    >you checked with the product manager (either for ALL-IN-1 or for CDA)
    >whether your action has contravened whatever agreement is in force.
    
    No. The decision was made by local management. I will inform them
    about the 3rd party royalty.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Jan
      
 |