[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:	OLD ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:	Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:	IOSG::PYE

Created:	Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:	Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	4343
Total number of notes:	18308

3192.0. "Application Maintainer's ACL on MLA element. Why?" by 49393::KURTH (Peter Kurth @RLE, R�mlang (Switzerland)) Wed Aug 25 1993 16:18

	HellO

	ALL-IN-1 V3.0-1 (1st=German, 2nd=English)

	User CUSTOMIZER is set as Appliation Maintainer (the SYSUAF-entry
	ownes OA$PRVAPP and OA$MANAPP, PRVAPP is A).

	When CUSTOMIZER processes a pending element (AM PME ML), the element
	gets the following ACL:

Directory OASYS$DISK:[ALLIN1.SITE.SOURCES_SHARE]

OA$FORMATTER_START.COM;1       8  25-AUG-1993 17:06:14.54  OA$MANAPP
 (RWED,RWED,RE,RE)
          (IDENTIFIER=[LLE_MAIN,CUSTOMIZER],OPTIONS=NOPROPAGATE,ACCESS=READ+
          WRITE+EXECUTE+DELETE+CONTROL)
          (IDENTIFIER=OA$MANAPP,ACCESS=READ+WRITE+EXECUTE+DELETE)

	Why the ACE "IDENTIFIER=[LLE_MAIN,CUSTOMIZER]"? If I do the same
	using the MANAGER, only the ACE "IDENTIFIER=OA$MANAPP" is added, which
	I think is correct.

	Any idea? Is this the intended behaviour?

	Regards, Peter

T.R Title User Personal
Name Date Lines

3192.1 Looks ok to me AIMTEC::WICKS_A U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! Mon Aug 30 1993 21:13 11

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
3192.1	Looks ok to me	AIMTEC::WICKS_A	U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there!	`Mon Aug 30 1993 21:13`	11
	Peter, I think this is the way it should work though I defer to the dutchman or the irishman for confirmation. remember MANAGER is a special user and has all thos VMS privs and the OA$MANAGER identifier etc so s/he has access to all the CM elements anyway so add the extra ACl for that one would be superfluous. regards, Andrew.D.Wicks

    Peter,
    
    I think this is the way it should work though I defer to the dutchman
    or the irishman for confirmation. remember MANAGER is a special user
    and has all thos VMS privs and the OA$MANAGER identifier etc so s/he
    has access to all the CM elements anyway so add the extra ACl for that
    one would be superfluous.
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks