| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 2923.1 | What formatter? | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO2-G/L2 | Fri Jun 25 1993 14:00 | 4 | 
|  | ALL-IN-1 supports more than one formatter.  What formatter is being used to 
format DX documents?  This is defined by the DX entry in the FORMAT master.
Richard
 | 
| 2923.2 | Theres more.... | EBYGUM::PAGETS | Still Working | Fri Jun 25 1993 15:32 | 35 | 
|  |     
    
    Just had a look in the format file and the entry fo DX is as below:
    
    
    
    Name:			DX
    Description:		DECdx formatted document
    Default Filename:		.DX
    Object Extension:
    DSAB Type:			DX
    Template Filename:
    
    Edit Function:
    					Initialisation File:
    					Purge Count:
    					Editor Type:
    
    List Function:
    Print Function:
    Standard Formatting:	N
    
    Compile Command:
    Template form:
    
    
    
    Is there a print function I should be using? Should it be set up for
    Standard Formatting?
    
    
    
    Cheers,
    
    Sean.
 | 
| 2923.3 | Upgrade to v3.0 is always a good idea | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Fri Jun 25 1993 15:41 | 11 | 
|  |     Sean,
    
    and to answer your trailing question. ALL-IN-1 v2.4 will be supported
    for quite a long time yet - at least until another major release of
    ALL-IN-1 occurs. However there are many good reasons for moving you
    or your customer to v3.0 as soon as possible so you should not hold
    back on that.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
 | 
| 2923.4 | Customisation...who needs it. | BLKPUD::PAGETS | Still Working | Wed Jun 30 1993 11:02 | 9 | 
|  |     
    Unfortunately, due to the level of customisation on site, V3.0 is not
    an immediate option, but more of a long term goal.
    
    Has any one any idea about the DX problem?
    
    Cheers,
    
    Sean Paget.
 |