| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4343 |
| Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hi All,
I am wondering if anyone has done an "audit" on an ALL-IN-1 IOS system.
Basically the problem we have at a site is that they have had field
test versions for ALL-IN-1 IOS, DEC MAILworks, CDA, OpenVMS , you name
it they have had it on their system. The have never had ALL-IN-1 IOS
2.4 they installed 3.0 field test and have installed the SSB kit.
WordPerfect or is it WordDefective is also installed, it a never
ALL-IN-1 IOS installation.
Now a number of the standard ALL-IN-1 sub-systems such as TM have
problems the system is highly customised. We alo find doing a
/nocustomise make no difference and some ALL-IN-1 function don't behave
as they should like "gold l" in some sub-systems. They have regular
stack dumps never in the same place and different ALL-IN-1 functions.
In this nightmare environment and that's not an understatement what
should I audit ? I have checked the checksum on the files in OA$BUILD
and found that oa$build:siteoallv.olb had a different checksum. It
does not mean much unless I have a means of systematically going
through ALL-IN-1 IOS files. What would you advise ?
Thanks in advance for your input,
Sunil 'desperately seeking a helping hand" Sethi :-)
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2864.1 | We have found the cause | TINNIE::SETHI | It's not wise to have wisdom teeth | Fri Aug 06 1993 05:54 | 27 |
G'day All,
I am no longer desperately seeking help we have managed to track down
the problem in a set of scripts.
The customer has written an application called quick mail and answer.
The application used the MAIL functions to create the messages and it
was found that one script had stuck dumps occuring on a regular bases.
The difference between it and the other was the coding of the MAIL
function.
In one script they did a MAIL CREATE/OPEN and this script didn't have
the problem and they did a MAIL CLOSE before copying the text file into
[.MSG]. The script with the problem didn't do a MAIL CREATE/OPEN and
copied the text file before it was closed.
I am just adding this reply here to make you all aware that in certain
circumstances you will get stack dumps at times if you do not "/OPEN"
when creating a message, or do a copy of the TEXT file before doing a
copy.
Now they have stack dumps happening due to WordPerfect and this will be
taken up with WPC Phhhh ;-).
Regards,
Sunil
| |||||