| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference | 
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 | 
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE | 
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 | 
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 4343 | 
| Total number of notes: | 18308 | 
    There have been quite a few notes in this and the V2.4 conference on
    the necessity to match ALL-IN-1 and FDL key names exactly, including
    the quotation marks if the FDL has them.
    
    My FDLs all have their key names in quotation marks, but when I trace
    the execution of an RSE using an alternate key, I get the same result
    whether or not I include the quotes around the alternate key.  Both do
    an indexed search.
    
    So now I'm confused.  After reading all the previous notes, I thought I
    was going to have to remove the quotation marks from all my FDLs, but
    now it seems I don't have to.  Could someone please explain?  Am I
    living in a fool's paradise?
    
    
    The Fool.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2172.1 | Just a shot - FOR Function | AIMTEC::BUTLER_T | Fri Jan 29 1993 20:05 | 10 | |
|     I believe it really came down to where the rse was being processed.
    
    The version may have something to do with it, also.
    
    Most of the cases I have seen involved the FOR function in 2.4 and
    previous versions.
    
    HTH,
    
    Tim
 | |||||