| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 2162.2 | New in WPS-PLUS V4 | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO2-G/L2 | Wed Jan 27 1993 14:28 | 6 | 
|  | 
SHOW_LIPS.BLP was a new file for WPS-PLUS V4.  Did your system once have 
ALL-IN-1 V2.4 with the WPS-PLUS V4 option?
Richard
 | 
| 2162.3 | Thanks for your answers | ZUR01::KURTH | Peter Kurth @RLE, R�mlang (CH) | Wed Jan 27 1993 14:53 | 5 | 
|  |     Yes, we had ALL-IN-1 V2.4 with the WPS-PLUS V4 option. But I did not
    find SHOW_LIPS.BLP in one of the OAW*-save-sets. I delete the
    OA$BLP_SHARE:SHOW_LIPS.BLP.
    
    Thanks. Gr�essli, Peter
 | 
| 2162.6 | I was relying on my memory! | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | MUP(pets) coming to ALL-IN-1 soon? | Thu Jan 28 1993 17:29 | 13 | 
|  |     Peter,                  
    
    You're right it's not there anymore - i'm sure it was there before I went 
    away for Christmas (honest) but now it's gone. I've just resubmitted it 
    under the title "Upgrade v2.4 to v3.0: SHOW_LIPS duplicate element in TXL"
    though I can't guarentee that it'll keep that title once Faith has edited it
    removed my spurious comments and added some facts to it.
    
    Sorry for the confusion.
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
 | 
| 2162.7 | LLV - SHARE, you were lucky | UTES09::EIJS | Simon Eijs @Utrecht, 7838-2558 | Thu Feb 04 1993 16:01 | 25 | 
|  |     
    Hi,
    
    Re .1),
    
    > Since the language areas are searched before the share areas, the
    > SHARE version couldn't have been executed, so I guess it would be
    > safe to delete it.
    
    Hmm, yes, when using the normal search order. However, the TXLO is
    compiled according to the entries in CM$APP, CM$MAF and
    CM$AUTH$LOCATIONS (the order has been mentioned here at least once).
    Now, within one application (e.g. "OA") the order in which the TXL
    compiler will search depends on the record order in CM$MAF (assuming
    that the weight (Priority) of all application areas are the same). The
    order in .0) is indeed LLV - SHARE. But in case of a SWEDISH example,
    it would be SHARE - LLV.
    
    If you want to make sure the TXL is compiled in the same order as the
    search logicals are defined (SHARE after LLV) change the priority of
    the CM$MAF record for "OA  SHARE" from 50 to 99. 
    
    Ciao,
    
    	Simon
 |