| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 2074.1 | We are? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | A year behind in more ways than one | Wed Jan 13 1993 17:17 | 8 | 
|  |     Randall,
    
    If this were true then it would have to be taken up in ABBOTT::A1INFO
    since we don't do "futures" here.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
 | 
| 2074.2 | restricted conference | WOTVAX::MORRISON |  | Wed Jan 13 1993 17:22 | 5 | 
|  | 
Sadly, I don't have access to the A1INFO conference, hence my 
question here.
Randall :-(
 | 
| 2074.3 | Try TeamLinks | CHRLIE::HUSTON |  | Wed Jan 13 1993 17:24 | 6 | 
|  |     
    You may want to put the question in the TeamLinks conference as well,
    (ABBOTT::WINDOWS_OFFICE), I would guess they would have  abetter 
    persective on anything MicrSoft is up to.
    
    
 | 
| 2074.5 | We're not, but... | IOSG::TALLETT | Gimmee an Alpha colour notebook... | Wed Jan 13 1993 18:42 | 21 | 
|  |     
    	I think what Microsoft is talking about is the public statement
    	by Digital that we will support the MAPI standard. This is a
    	mail API that MS is pushing which promises to separate the
    	clients and servers so that any MAPI-compliant client (front
    	end) would plug into any MAPI-complient server (back-end).
    
    	Microsoft plans to make MS-Mail use MAPI (currently it doesn't)
    	and hope other mail-client vendors will do the same. This could
    	leave us to freely compete in the back-end business without
    	having to compete in the front-end business and vice-versa.
    
    	What would you think if Digital *did* do this? Does it sound like
    	a good thing? Its certainly what customers are asking for.
    
    	Note that the public statement that Digital will support MAPI
    	and saying that MS-Mail will be able to "do" ALL-IN-1 IOS mail
    	are very different things.
    
    Regards,
    Paul
 | 
| 2074.6 | Another possibility | AIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Wed Jan 13 1993 20:18 | 5 | 
|  |         MS-Mail v3.0 will soon be a supported end user client for the
        MAILbus Postmaster for LANs/WANs product.  This is scheduled for
        release in Q3.  Might that be it?
        
        Dave Zaniewski
 | 
| 2074.7 | POinter to that conference | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | A year behind in more ways than one | Wed Jan 13 1993 21:14 | 7 | 
|  |     Dave might have it since Q3 in DIGITAL year 1993 is Q1 for real people.
    
    The MAILbus Postmaster conference is of course at MRKTNG::POSTMASTERV2
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
 | 
| 2074.8 | Yes, I agree | IOSG::TALLETT | Gimmee an Alpha colour notebook... | Thu Jan 14 1993 08:01 | 6 | 
|  |     
    	Yes. The Q1 date doesn't fit for MAPI as Microsoft are only
    	sending it to Beta in Q3CY93. Daves idea is more likely.
    
    Regards,
    Paul
 | 
| 2074.9 | Thanks. | WOTVAX::MORRISON |  | Thu Jan 14 1993 13:05 | 18 | 
|  | 
Thanks for all your suggestions.  My original thought was that 
someone in ALL-IN-1 engineering was writing a prototype which 
interfaces to A1DA or something.
I've tried the Postmaster conference before, but they are a bit 
reluctant to talk about MS Mail support.  Support for MAPI is 
still a long way off, even Microsoft are not committing to have 
the full MAPI specs available for quite some time.
I've asked my customer to get back to Microsoft and find which 
group in Digital they are talking to.
Thanks again.
Randall
 |