| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4343 |
| Total number of notes: | 18308 |
<<< BCSE::ABBOTT$DUA1:[NOTES$LIBRARY]WINDOWS_OFFICE.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Windows Office Project >-
================================================================================
Note 1263.0 ALL-IN-1 V3.0 COEXISTENT 2 replies
MFRFMS::SUSANNE 10 lines 9-NOV-1992 10:17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi all.
my customer has installed ALL-IN-1 IOS V2.4, TCP and Teamlink V1.0. Now he wants
to install an ALL-IN-1 V3.0 coexistent system on the same machine and then
testing Teamlink with the new ALL-IN-1 V3.0 system. Is it possible to work with
Teamlink V1.0 and ALL-IN-1 V3.0 coexistent or there are problems with the
logicals and the tables.
thanks and regards
Susanne
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1786.2 | Until an expert stops by | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Liverpool 4 Norwich 1 | Mon Nov 16 1992 16:38 | 9 |
Susanne,
I'm not an expert but as i've already said in the TeamLinks conference
the TCP release notes explicitily state that it is not supported as part of
a co-ex ALL-IN-1 system.
regards,
Andrew.D.wicks
| |||||
| 1786.4 | wouldn't have two FCS's | CHRLIE::HUSTON | Tue Nov 17 1992 13:30 | 10 | |
You wouldn't get two FCS, each installation would install a FCS, the
second would simply overwrite the first. Problem with this is that
you could potentially overwrite the latest FCS with an older one,
depending on versions of TL and ALL-IN-1.
But, as Andrew said, TL doesn't support co-existant systems anyway.
--Bob
| |||||