| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1577.1 | Could you get the .WPL file | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO1-D/4A | Fri Oct 09 1992 11:21 | 12 | 
|  | I have seen a few reports of this problem but have never been able to
reproduce it.  It appears that the listing files produced by the WPS-PLUS
V3.1 and 4.0 formatters are different, and that the ALL-IN-1 COPY_TO_PORT
function has problems processing some V4.0 files. 
Could you get a copy of the .WPL file that is giving problems so that we 
can investigate this further.
thanks,
Richard
 | 
| 1577.2 | See 1591.0 for the solution | OASS::BURNAMAN_B | And now, live, from Atlanta . . . | Fri Oct 09 1992 16:11 | 9 | 
|  |     Greetings:
    
    I have added note number 1591 which contains a fix for the problem you
    are reporting.  I hope it helps.
    
    Regards,
    
    Bruce Burnaman
    CSC/Atlanta
 | 
| 1577.3 | Fix will introduce other problems | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO1-D/4A | Fri Oct 09 1992 17:17 | 41 | 
|  | I have been sent another file which reproduces the problem.  There is a
problem in the COPY_TO_PORT port function which causes it to not process
records which are greater than 512 bytes. 
The WPS-PLUS V4 formatter can create files with records which are longer
than 512 bytes.  When creating LP11 files it does bolding by overstriking.
For a line with bolding the WPS-PLUS V3.1 formatter record would consist
of: 
	the normal characters,
	a CR,
	the characters which are to bolded,
For example (where the B L and E are bolded):
	This is BOLDED<CR>        B L E<CR><LF>
The V4 formatter creates a record containing:
	the normal characters,
	a CR,
	the first character to be bolded,
	the second character to be bolded,
	the third character to be bolded,
	etc.
For example:
	This is BOLDED<CR>        B<CR>          L<CR>            E<CR><LF>
If bolding is turned of an off many times in a line the record will be very 
long, and may exceed the COPY_TO_PORT 512 byte limit.
The fix described in topic 1591 will introduce other problems because it 
does not emulate the COPY_TO_PORT /PAGE_EJECT qualifier.  
Richard
 | 
| 1577.4 | Current Status | KERNEL::SMITHERSJ | Living on the culinary edge.... | Mon Oct 19 1992 10:00 | 11 | 
|  |     Richard
    
    What is the current status of this one now that the problem
    is reproducable?  I have a customer with the same problem and
    although it isn't causing him too much of a problem, it would 
    be nice to give him a definite answer.
    
    Thanks
    julia
    Uk CSC
    
 | 
| 1577.5 | Status is... | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO1-D/4A | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:19 | 10 | 
|  | The COPY_TO_PORT problem with files having records longer than 512 bytes is
in our problem database to be fixed in a PFR.
I have also submitted a problem report to the WPS-PLUS group requesting 
that they do not create files with such long records, because COPY_TO_PORT 
is not the only thing which can be affected by this difference in the 
WPS-PLUS V3.1 and V4.0/.1 formatters.
Richard
 |