| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1503.1 | More information please | IOSG::MAURICE | See below | Thu Sep 24 1992 16:33 | 9 | 
|  |     Hi,
    
    Does the user's VMS account name (EM101AA1) have an identifier?
    
    What is PCFS$UPDATE?
    
    Cheers
    
    Stuart
 | 
| 1503.2 | PCFS = Pathworks | IOSG::TALLETT | Arranging bits for a living... | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:55 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 1503.3 | UAF entry looks like this... | JOCKEY::MCCAFFREYJ | If in doubt switch it off. | Fri Sep 25 1992 09:21 | 44 | 
|  |     Hi.
    
    no the entry in authorize does show any identifiers, but then neither
    does the account on which it does work.  Pathworks is running on this 
    machine.
    
    EM101AA1's authorize entry looks like this....
    
    Username: EM101AA1                         Owner:  Fred Bloggs
    Account:                                   UIC:    [500,33]([EM101AA1])
    CLI:      DCL                              Tables: DCLTABLES
    Default:  DISK$ALLIN1:[EM101AA1]
    LGICMD:   SYS$MANAGER:A1_LOGIN.COM
    Flags:  Restricted
    Primary days:   Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
    Secondary days:                     Sat Sun
    No access restrictions
    Expiration:            (none)    Pwdminimum:  6   Login Fails:     0
    Pwdlifetime:         90 00:00    Pwdchange:  23-SEP-1992 11:32
    Last Login: 25-SEP-1992 09:00 (interactive),            (none)
    (non-interactive)
    Maxjobs:         0  Fillm:       100  Bytlm:        36000
    Maxacctjobs:     0  Shrfillm:      0  Pbytlm:           0
    Maxdetach:       0  BIOlm:        50  JTquota:       1024
    Prclm:          10  DIOlm:        50  WSdef:          600
    Prio:            4  ASTlm:       100  WSquo:         1000
    Queprio:         0  TQElm:        50  WSextent:      3000
    CPU:        (none)  Enqlm:       300  Pgflquo:      20000
    Authorized Privileges:
      TMPMBX NETMBX
    Default Privileges:
      TMPMBX NETMBX
    
    
    
    I can't see anything else unusual about it.
    
    It does seem to  create the drawer and allows other users to access it
    but this error message keeps displ�aying itself.  
    
    help - any pointers?
    
    thanks for any help...
    josie
 | 
| 1503.4 |  | IOSG::MAURICE | See below | Mon Sep 28 1992 08:32 | 13 | 
|  |     My guess is that it's something to do with identifier PCFS$UPDATE. Have
    you any idea why the ACE with identifier is being added? Another guess
    is that the error message:
    
    %OA-I-LOGERROR, -OA-W-ACL_NO_HOLDERS, No VMS accounts hold identifier
    !AS
    
    is significant. How about giving PCFS$UPDATE to an account and seeing
    what happens.
    
    Cheers
    
    Stuart
 | 
| 1503.5 | Bug IMHO | IOSG::TALLETT | Arranging bits for a living... | Mon Sep 28 1992 10:50 | 9 | 
|  |     
    	This is a teeny bit serious if you indeed need to give PCFS$UPDATE
    	to an account. Pathworks puts the PCFS$UPDATE identifier onto all
    	directories served up in a file service as far as I can tell.
    
    	Please submit a bug so that it gets fixed.
    
    Regards,
    Paul
 | 
| 1503.6 | Fixed! | JOCKEY::MCCAFFREYJ | If in doubt switch it off. | Tue Sep 29 1992 10:55 | 26 | 
|  |     Well it seems that we have worked out the answer with the help
    of a Pathworks Specialist...
    
    The problem was that a Pathworks file service had been created
    at the top level of the disk.  All Pathworks file services have
    ACEs associated with them not only on the file service itself but
    on the directory above which in this case was 000000.DIR.  As VMS
    propogates all ACEs on any new directories created by VMS, regardless of
    being Pathworks directories or not the EM101AA1 directory had the 
    ACE attached. This ACE was the one causing us the problem. 
    
    The fix was to move the Pathworks file services to sub directories
    and then remove the ACE from the top directory and then my EM101AA1
    directory.
    
    This could cause us a future problem if a user directory is also
    a Pathworks file service as Pathworks needs the ACE whereas ALL-IN-1
    will throw up the error message when it comes across it.
    
    thanks for your help 
    
    josie
    
    
    
    
 | 
| 1503.7 | Me too... | ROMEDU::NEBBIA | Mario Nebbia @RIO - EDU Rome Italy | Fri Nov 27 1992 11:46 | 15 | 
|  | >    The fix was to move the Pathworks file services to sub directories
>    and then remove the ACE from the top directory and then my EM101AA1
>    directory.
I fond the same problem, but the PCSA ACE is set over all the ALL-IN-1 
directories of the disk where ALL-IN-1 is installed and the user files are
created...
What is the most simple (and safe) way to remove the PCSA ACEs from all the 
directories of the disk (PCSA is no more installed on the system) without 
damaging the ALL-IN-1 ACEs???
Thanks
						Mario
 | 
| 1503.8 | set acl ? | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | AJAX beats Feyenoord again and again | Fri Nov 27 1992 12:31 | 9 | 
|  |     Mario,
    
    I didn't test it, but try something like....
    
    $ set acl /object=file /delete /acl=(iden=pcfs$update) [*...]*.*.*
    
    Regards,
    
    Jan
 |