| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference | 
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 | 
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE | 
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 | 
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 4343 | 
| Total number of notes: | 18308 | 
A major ALL-IN-1 customer tried tailoring ALL-IN-1 V2.4 to sort DDS output. I'm no ALL-IN-1 Programmer but I think they used a BIND/SORT. Does that make sense? They found the performance of the tailoring less than acceptable and would like to know if there is any likelihood of the ALL-IN-1 V3 implementation being any quicker. Grateful for your help David
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1259.1 | Aren't you the expert? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | It wasn't supposed to end this way | Wed Aug 19 1992 22:11 | 10 | 
|     David,
    
    Have you ever read the definitive work on DDS and ALL-IN-1 written
    by one David Hare?
    
    I think the performance of sorting is the same in v3.0.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks 
 | |||||