| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4343 |
| Total number of notes: | 18308 |
G'day All,
I have opened this topic to keep you all abreast of ALL-IN-1 Version
3.0 and WordPerefect integration kit. The Beta test version is being
currently tested in Australia currently. The customer has VMS Version
5.5-1 installed.
^^^^^
A similar error to the one in note 689 has been reported
"OA$FORMATTER_START SEND_JBC OPERATION ERROR". In addition to this
when you run the oa$formatter.exe interactively you get the following
error
$ MC OA$FORMATTER
%DCL-W-ACTIMAGE, error activating image DECW$DXMLIBSHR
-CLI-E-IMAGEFNF, image file not found
$1$DUA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.][SYSLIB]DECW$DXMLIBSHR.EXE;
To check if the oa$formatter.exe is the version provided by Digital I
did the following $CHECK/IMAGE SYS$SYSTEM:OA$FORMATER.EXE, the line you
are interested in is the last line here is a sample
$ CHECK/IMAGE SYS$SYSTOA$FORMATTER.EXE
EM:OA$FORMATTER.EXE
file SYS$COMMON:[SYSEXE]OA$FORMATTER.EXE;2
image section %D'1' checksum is %X'000ACEF2'
image section %D'3' checksum is %X'E5A5FAE1'
image section %D'4' checksum is %X'AEF273C2'
image section %D'5' checksum is %X'43378A97'
image section %D'6' checksum is %X'57D5CF83'
image section %D'7' checksum is %X'7DD90D00'
image section %D'8' checksum is %X'0A1BACAB'
image header checksum is %X'2549E984'
checksum of all image sections is %X'7382234A' <--- WordPerfect Image
Note the check sum for our image is %X'77CB5636'. I have been told by
the VMS group that the checksum does not change even if VMS Versions do
not match. I looked at the OA$BUILD:OAFORMATTER.OBJ it contained version
2 and was created 29-APR-1992 where as ours is dated the 12-MAR-1992.
It also the logical SMBSRVSHR is no longer used and has been replaced by
(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE) "SMBSRVSHR_WPCORP_PTR51" = "SYS$SHARE:SMBSRVSHR"
I cannot say for sure if SYS$SHARE:SMBSRVSHR.EXE has been replaced
because I do not have a copy of the image version "X-1" only the
Pathworks image. If one of you could check by doing the following :-)
ANALYZE/IMAGE/INTERACTIVE SYS$SHARE:SMBSRVSHR.EXE
Providing it comes up with the module version: "X-1", then do a
CHECK/IMAGE the check sum I have from the customers site is
%X'7382234A'. If they are different than it's been updated.
It would be good if any news could be posted here regarding any updates
on WordPerfect and ALL-IN-1 Version 3 integration. I have told the
customer they need to talk to WordPerfect, as soon as I have some
more news I will post it here. Hopefully we will keep one step ahead of
our customers.
Sunil
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051.1 | Coming soon to a CSC near me | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | DEC Mail Works for ME sometimes | Wed Jul 15 1992 17:24 | 13 |
Sunil,
here in the U.S WordPerfect issued their final field-test kit yesterday
(I think I get confused with dates here as the U.S does them backwards
i.e 7/8 is really 8/7) with the intention of shipping in a few weeks ahead
of the Labour day holiday. We have an earlier version installed somewhere
here and i'll try and check your problem their but i'm pretty sure that
machine doesn't have 5.5-1 on it.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
| |||||
| 1051.2 | I tried | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | DEC Mail Works for ME sometimes | Wed Jul 15 1992 23:06 | 10 |
Sunil,
As I suspected our system is running VMS v5.4-2 and our module version
isn't X-1 it's X-4! the checksum is %X'7382234A'
oh well
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
| |||||
| 1051.3 | OA$FORMATTER requires motif because of CDA 2.1 !!!??? | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Thu Jul 16 1992 07:32 | 23 |
Hi,
The error message in .0
>$ MC OA$FORMATTER
>%DCL-W-ACTIMAGE, error activating image DECW$DXMLIBSHR
>-CLI-E-IMAGEFNF, image file not found
>$1$DUA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.][SYSLIB]DECW$DXMLIBSHR.EXE;
Well I discussed this matter with our man in the field. He has
informed me that the customer is testing the field test version of CDA
2.1. It looks like CDA requires Motif to be installed even if you have
VT terminals.
The question is can someone tell me what is the connection between
OA$FORMATTER and Motif ? I am a bit stumped for an explaination. As
soon as our man in the field has installed and fully tested ALL-IN-1,
CDA, WordPerfect and Motif I will enter more details in here.
Looks like this site loves being a beta test site for anything and
everything.
Sunil
| |||||
| 1051.4 | Because CDA requires it | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO1-D/4A | Thu Jul 16 1992 10:22 | 17 |
The ALL-IN-1 V3.0 background formatter supports CDA formatting in addition
to the ASCII and WPS-PLUS formatting supported in previous versions. The
CDA converter routines we have to call to provide CDA formatting have
dependencies on Motif.
For an answer to the question:
Why do CDA routines (for a Compound Document Architecture) have a
dependency on the routines for Motif, a Graphical User Interface?
you should ask the CDA group. I have never been able to think of a good
reason. It may be because the CDA group didn't think that CDA would be
used in environment that didn't have DECwindows and/or DECwrite. I
understand that CDA is being repackaged to remove this dependency.
Richard
| |||||