Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

    It's very good to see this available.  It most certainly adds value to
    a number of customers.

    I realise that the Read-me-if-all-else-fails document isn't really
    intended to be read by customers but it often is.  I suggest expanding
    the %LAs like I18N (most especially) and CLD to make it more clear.

    Trying to be of small help,
    don

I'm sure the ASSETS folks in Valbonne will note your comments Don.  

I believe that MJU (Mail Janitor Utility) and FCR (File Cabinet Report) for 
ALL-IN-1 V3.0 should be available soon, too.

Tony

    Any plans to make this available in countries without an ASSETS program
    - such as the U.S (:==:)
    
    Just anticipating more phone calls to us ...
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks

    About that MJU...  Has there been any research into a turbo MJU?  We
    just ran the turbo FCVR at this customer site, and it finished in just
    over twenty-six hours.  The V2.4 janitor takes thirty-seven hours...
    
    ** WISH ** 
    
    Any performance improvements for the janitor would be great, especially
    something like the way the T-FCVR processes users in groups based on
    their ALL-IN-1 disk name.
    
    This is a customer request, so if there's anything else the customer
    can do, I'll be happy to let them know.
    
    						Cheers, Dan'l

    Janitor doesn't have the complicated interdependencies that FCVR does,
    so splitting it into separate processes for batches of users should be
    quite easy. In fact you could do the different batches on different
    runs (for example, different nights).
    
    In fact, the provided option (EW) lets you only do certain departments.
    You could easily customise this to do batches of users based on some
    other criteria (such as ones beginning A to D or something like that).
    
    A certain large user in Delaware has split their Janitor runs up by
    initial letter of username for years now.
    
    Of course, as it's so easy, you could say we should do it in the
    product!
    
    Dave.

    Re .6
    
    Hi,
    
>    We just ran the turbo FCVR at this customer site, and it finished in just
>    over twenty-six hours.  
    
    Seems too long. Have your customer check the memory recommendations in
    the manual. Also check that parallel processing is indeed taking place,
    which will be obvious from the log depending on whether the times the
    users are being processed are sequential or not.
    
>    This is a customer request, so if there's anything else the customer
>    can do, I'll be happy to let them know.
    
    I think that the official way is by an SPR. But IMO contacting the
    Product Manager is more likely to be effective. And the closer the
    messenger is to the customer the better.
    
    Cheers
    
    Stuart

    To answer ADW's question...
    
    I believe that discussions are taking place with the U.S. ASSETS
    people. This might result in CHECKMAIL, FCR, and MJU being made
    available in the U.S. sometime.  It would probably be a good thing for
    people in the U.S. to lobby the ASSETS people there, and help them do
    the right thing.
    
    Tony

    re: base entry
    
    I have search in the EOASSETS notes conference for a pointer to the new
    V3.0 version of CHECKMAIL, but only find up to V2.4 .  You give a great
    explanation of this feature, in the base note...but neglect to tell us
    where we may find this saveset.
    
    Care to share?
    
    jeremy

    You have to ask ASSETS that question... They are responsible for the
    distribution of the kit. I just build it.  If it's for a U.S. customer
    I suggest you contact me off-line and we'll work out how to get a kit
    for you.  European ASSETS handle European customers only...
    
    Tony