| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1003.1 | | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Wed Jul 08 1992 07:19 | 5 |
| Sorry I have come across two misfeatues and not 3 as stated.
Sunil
:-)
|
| 1003.2 | typos in OA.A1$MSG | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | IOS: better than the real thing | Wed Jul 08 1992 11:57 | 28 |
|
Hi Sunil,
>Could you please test this for me in Australia
Sorry, my boss won't let me.
Problem looks like a typo.
Entries for file message operations in OA.A1$MSG contain wrong text:
XFO_FILE_MESSAGE_0 <No messages have been crossfiled>
XFO_FILE_MESSAGE_1 <1 message has been crossfiled>
XFO_FILE_MESSAGE_MANY <!AS messages have been crossfiled>/FAO_COUNT=1
You and our customers can add the corrected version of
these messages thought CM in SITEOA.A1$MSG... (element = SITEOA,
type = A1$MSG).
Regards,
Jan
|
| 1003.3 | What do you want the message to say? | IOSG::MAURICE | Ceci n'est pas une note | Wed Jul 08 1992 13:07 | 9 |
| Just clarifying - you do know that File Message is a crossfile? So with
that in mind the text of the message is not really wrong. In fact it
may help the user realise that FM = XFD. Many of us wanted to change FM
into RFD, but this was rejected on the grounds that we could not change
the behaviour of existing functionality.
Cheers
Stuart
|
| 1003.4 | consistency | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | IOS: better than the real thing | Wed Jul 08 1992 13:42 | 10 |
| > -< What do you want the message to say? >-
I want consistency between the option text and the result message.
So the menu option "XFM File messages" should finish
with "messages filed".
Regards,
Jan
|
| 1003.6 | Just some food for thought | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Thu Jul 09 1992 00:48 | 21 |
| G'day,
I should have realized that the XFM and FM option do cross-file
messages. I had to customize a this option a few years ago at a site
to not cross-file.
Is there a reason why FM and XFM cross file messages ? In a
conventional office this would not happen as far as I know. Apart from
that we do have Cross-file options called XFD and XFF, I know they are
for documents and not EM's. Just for consistency it would be a good
idea that the FM etc. options do not cross-file and the cross-file ones
do. Just some food for thought.
Re .2
Jan
I just missed a full stop, just think you could have got a trip to
Australia because of a missing full stop :-).
Sunil
|
| 1003.7 | Trivially... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:38 | 6 |
| I'm sure someone with even more historical trivia wasting most of their
brain space will correct me on this, but I believe this behaviour is
probably another of those things that we did to make the product look
more like DECmail....
Graham
|
| 1003.8 | RE: .7 | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Fri Jul 10 1992 16:15 | 4 |
| 'fraid so.
Dave (ALL-IN-1 historian)
|
| 1003.9 | | SAHQ::WOLFE | John Wolfe - (404)-924-6463 | Fri Jul 10 1992 19:11 | 10 |
|
Strange! You make FM be a crossfile so it works like DECmail.
I would guess the demand for this came from internal users? We
have been customizing FM to be a refile on our internal systems since 2.2
or maybe earlier.
Ah well, I guess this keeps everyone busy :-).
John
|