| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference | 
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 | 
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE | 
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 | 
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 4343 | 
| Total number of notes: | 18308 | 
    Hello,
    
    I am not sure if this is the right conference for this problem, but 
    I'm sure that someone will tell so if it is not !
    
    
    On a customer system (ALL-IN-1 V2.4) and on our development system 
    (ALL-IN-1 V3.0), there is an error in MB$A1_XXXX.LOG. The error is :
    
    Checking ALL-IN-1 sender and fetcher queues
    %RMS-E-FNF, file not found
    
    Unusal job termination.
    
    The SENDERCHECK.EXE and FETCHCHECK.EXE are in oa$lib. 
    Can someone tell me what file is it looking for ?
    
    
    thanks & regards,
    Sau Ha
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 941.2 | But we can help a little here | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | DEC Mail Works for ME sometimes | Fri Jun 26 1992 16:22 | 12 | 
|     Sau Ha,
    
    The file you are executing is 
    SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MB$.MB.MB$COM]MB$A1_ER.COM;1
    (assuming MR is installed on SYS$SYSDEVICE of course)
    so running it interactively with Verify switched on will show what it is
    missing.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
                                    
 | |||||
| 941.3 | PENDING?? | SAHQ::WOLFE | John Wolfe - (404)-924-6463 | Fri Jun 26 1992 18:44 | 6 | 
| I remember submitting an IPR re PENDING.DAT not having an ACL so MR could read it. Could that be the problem? John | |||||
| 941.6 | Here is the result.... | WELCLU::LI | Sau Ha Li, Welwyn | Mon Jun 29 1992 09:43 | 15 | 
|     Hello,
    
    I have run [MB$.MB.MB$COM]MB$A1_ER.COM interactively with SET VERIFY 
    and it has completed successfully. I did it from the ALL-IN-1 
    account.
    
    The file protection for OA$DATA:PENDING.DAT is (RWED,RWED,,).
    If this is wrong, can someone tell what the protection should be and 
    why is it wrong ? Is it a bug ?
    
    
    thanks & regards,
    Sau Ha
                                        
 | |||||