| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference | 
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 | 
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE | 
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 | 
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 4343 | 
| Total number of notes: | 18308 | 
The documentation of the CAL$ATTENDEE DSAB (Ref1 p.7-17) states that this DSAB contains a field called FILLER which is intended for customization purposes. I had to customize the time management for a customer during the last weeks and I saw that this field does NOT exist. Is this an error in documentation or is something incorrect with the CAL$ATTENDEE DSAB? Another question in connection with CAL$ATTENDEE concerns the script OA$DO:TMSEV_ATTSYM.SCP. This script is intended to load the #cal_attn_xxxxx symbols which are use by several calendar functions. If you have a look at this script you'll see that the key used to load the contents of the fields of CAL$ATTENDEE into symbols is #cal_meeting_pointer. At my opinion this is incorrect because the key of cal$attendee is built of the meeting_pointer plus the attendee's username. That means, after completing this script all #cal_attn_xxxxx symbols are "". Am I wrong or does the described ALL-IN-1 code contain some errors? Stefan
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 843.1 | Bug in definition of CAL$ATTENDEE data-set | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Wed Jun 10 1992 14:52 | 11 | 
|     This is, in fact, a bug.
    
    There is enough space in the file (record length = 251) to hold the
    filler field, but the data-set is incorrectly defined in the code (note
    to developers - field-count in the $DSAB declaration in OACMA.BLI is 8;
    should be 9 - note that the FDT also needs changing, as it defines
    field 'REMOTE_ATTENDEE' which is commented out of the FNT!).
    
    If you'd like this fixed, please submit an SPR.
    
    Dave.
 | |||||
| 843.2 | already reported | SHALOT::LAMPSON | If you read this, you're too close! | Wed Jun 10 1992 15:12 | 5 | 
|         This problem has already been reported and has a THR number
        assigned to it.  I don't dare give the number here for fear 
        this note would be hidden!  ~/~
        
        _M
 | |||||
| 843.3 | I even sent the updated sources, eons ago... | SHALOT::LANPHEAR | Test the water or turn the tide? | Wed Jun 10 1992 22:45 | 1 | 
| 843.4 | Bring back the Calendar Girls | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | DEC Mail Works for ME sometimes | Wed Jun 10 1992 22:58 | 6 | 
|     Do I detect a sense of despondency about TM from my colleagues a few
    miles up I-85.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
 | |||||