| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4343 |
| Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hi,
I couldn't find any information with a few quick searches, so pardon
me if I missed it.
Is there any reason why the II (index inbox) option lists the
_MODIFIED_ date under 'Received'? Shouldn't it be POSTED instead?
If it's a bug, I'll [have the customer] SPR it...
> Index of Inbox
> (Selections: 0) (New messages: 1 )
>
> No. Folder Title Sender Received
>
> > 1 INBOX just more testing ALL-IN-1 System 02-Jun-1992
^^^
should be POSTED date!
Cheers, Dan'l
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 788.1 | You knew this really | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Liverpool win the F.A Cup again! | Tue Jun 02 1992 23:50 | 17 |
Dan'l
Shame on you (:==:) - this was in this very notes file about a week ago.
It's done this way for "performance reasons" MODIFIED is in the DOCDB
whereas POSTED is in the DAF which takes quite a bit longer to get at.
Someone did once post a QAR about the labelling of the field being
wrong but it got a "Thank for for your SPR" answer.
Of course you can customise it (using CM of course) and then your
customer can take longer coffee breaks !!
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
| |||||