|  |     Hello.
    
    Yes, the problem has been fixed in BL123 (it involved the use
    of the /LANGUAGE qualifier SM$_LANG_YN_NUM on the affected fields). 
    Unfortunately, if you created or edited any user accounts with the 
    earlier, uncorrected, baselevels, they will still have 0/1s stored
    in the Profile. If you edit the affected accounts from the latest 
    baselevel, all will hopefully be well, and Y/Ns stored in the Profile 
    in all cases, not 0/1s. Please, let me know if this is not the case.
    Please beware that you have no customized versions of the following
    forms lying around from old V3.0 BLs, as they may perpetuate the 
    problem:
      SM$CREATE$PROFILE.FLX 
      SM$GLOBAL$EDIT.FLX        
      SMTEMPLATE.FLX             
      SM$PROFILE.FLX            
      SM$TPL$GE.FLX          
    
    Hope this helps,
    DaveT 
    (p.s. IOSG:: closing down shortly, so I may not be able to respond
          very soon to this.)                             
 | 
|  |     Hello Dave,
    
    Thank you for your reply.
    
    I had a look at the profile entry I have corrected the another day 
    and all the values look fine.
    
    However, when I use the template that I have created in the previous 
    BLxxx to create a new account, the Create new group field still 
    contains 0 instead of N. The value in the template is 0 too. So, I 
    assume this is the cause. everything is fine after I have changed the 
    template.
    
    Conclusion: I need to check the account templates as well as the 
    existing accounts.
    
    Is this a correct conclusion?
    
    
    regards,
    Sau Ha
 | 
|  |     Sau,
    
    In the absence of my fellow "closed-down" Welshman (:==:) who may not
    be back until Tuesday - all those holidays they have in the U.K!!
    i'd say yes that templates are a wise thing to check.
    
    Also for anyone else who has been through lots of pre-SSB and SSB
    baselevels be wary of things left lying around as permanent symbols.
    
    Deleting your and the system PST (and recreating them is a drastic
    alternative that works) but look out for those pesky 0 and 1 that 
    should be Y and N there also.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
    
 |