[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
|
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
365.0. "Users receive msg with subject, no text" by AUNTB::GRAYD () Mon Mar 30 1992 20:23
I've looked through the old conferences and found nothing, so I need
some assistance. The customer scenario is as follows: It is a large
site (over 14,000 ALL-IN-1 users spread over 6 nodes/clusters) running
ALL-IN-1 V2.3.
In order for the EW job to complete within a weekend on some of the larger
machines, they have modified it so that it splits the users up into
subgroups, alphabetically, based on a predefined number specified when
the routine is scheduled. So, instead of running one big job, they run
20 small ones, most of them going at the same time. They also have
cleanmail incorporated. Customer asked me to add some code to EW that
would send a message to users with the total number of documents over a
certain limit (defined by a logical) informing them that they have 'x'
documents of a certain type (documents or mail messages).
So, I added the following psuedo-code to the JANCLEAN script that
executes immediately after the CLEANMAIL message is sent:
Initialize counters
For CAB$ do increment counters based on document type/age
If #total_docs (total # in user's DOCDB) is greater than
LOG$OA_OLD_DOC_LIMIT then
MAIL PUSH
MAIL CREATE/OPEN/NOSEND
MAIL TO "ME"
MAIL SUBJECT "Document Report"
MAIL TEXT " "
...
MAIL CLOSE_MESSAGE
MAIL SEND
CABINET DELETE_OR_REFILE ,OA$WASTEBASKET
MAIL POP
Naturally, this ran like a champ on the small 50 user test system I
had. The first time I ran it on the live systems, almost no one received
the message because I ran into a CHANNELCNT limitation and had to
increase it. Now, I'm finding that all users are getting the message, but
some are getting the complete message and some (the majority) are
getting a message that contains just the subject, but no text at all.
The only consistency that I've found is that once a user
in a subgroup fails to receive the message with text, everyone below
that user in that subgroup fails as well. Example:
On one two-node cluster, each subgroup was submitted as a batch job on
alternating nodes. The first job was on node A, the second on node B
and so on.
Subgroup 1 - first 4 users had text, the rest didn't
Subgroup 2 - all users had text
Subgroup 3 - no users had text
Subgroup 4 - all users had text
Subgroup 5 - first user had text, rest didn't
Subgroup 6 - no users had text
Subgroup 7 - first user had text, rest didn't
Subgroup 8 - first 3 users had text, rest didn't
I must be running out of something, but I'm not sure what. Any
ideas? I appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Danny
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
365.1 | How does ALL-IN-1 deal with PGFLQUO? | AUNTB::GRAYD | | Fri Apr 03 1992 18:56 | 15 |
| I've been trying to isolate the problem further. The CSC suggests one
of two problems, the old NEWDIR not releasing global buffers problem or
a PGFLQUO problem. Because users are continuing to receive the
CLEANMAIL message, I'm ruling out the NEWDIR bug for right now. The
question I need to know is how do the FOR CAB$ and MAIL functions
create pages. Are they READ or WRITE and how are they charged against
PGFLQUO. In order to do this, I may needt to bump up PGFLQUO for the
ALLIN1 account, but I also have to figure out how much. I may also
need to bump VIRTUALPAGECNT on the system. Again, I need to know how
much. If anyone can explain how this works, please give me some
assistance.
Thanks,
DG
|
365.2 | A couple of things to try | BUFFER::VICKERS | If it helps a customer, DO IT | Fri Apr 03 1992 19:58 | 13 |
| I'm afraid that I can't give you any details about how ALL-IN-1 uses
PGFLQUO other than to say that ALL-IN-1 tends to enjoy maximizing its
use of resources.
I would suggest that you might want to observe the operation in an
attempt to observe the resource usage. One way could be to use
MONITOR/RECORD PROC.
Another approach is to double PGFLQUO and see if that has any changes.
The setting is supposed to be at 20,000 for normal operations.
Good luck,
don
|