| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1615.1 |  | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sun Oct 22 1989 23:36 | 5 | 
|  |     ReGIS you have, but what you want is DRCS (I think), or a "soft"
    character set, which DECterm doesn't provide. 
    
    			Steve
 | 
| 1615.2 |  | NWD002::EVANS_BR |  | Tue Oct 24 1989 14:57 | 2 | 
|  |     I use sixels, but its alot of characters!!!!
 | 
| 1615.3 | DECterm does support sixels | HANNAH::MESSENGER | Bob Messenger | Tue Oct 24 1989 19:37 | 7 | 
|  | Re: .2
If the prompt is in sixels, then what's the problem?  (Granted, there are
some nasty bugs in DECterm V1's sixel implementation).
				-- Bob
 | 
| 1615.4 | Anybody thinking about DRCS? | RIPPLE::FARLEE_KE | Insufficient Virtual...um...er... | Wed Oct 25 1989 13:13 | 6 | 
|  | Is there any plan to implement DRCS in the future, or is it
too far from being compatible with the DECterm fonts to 
be of any hope?
Kevin
 | 
| 1615.5 |  | SMAUG::MENDEL | What've we done to our fair sister? | Thu Oct 26 1989 12:42 | 9 | 
|  |     Yes, I now understand that DECterm supports sixels, but it is 
    Down-line-loaded DRCS characters that I use as the means, which
    isn't supported. The old <DCS> ... { ... <ST> escape sequences.
    And I have such a nice dragon prompt, too.
    Kevin
 | 
| 1615.6 | Pseudo DRCS in V2.  Real DRCS in V?. | HANNAH::MESSENGER | Bob Messenger | Thu Oct 26 1989 15:57 | 14 | 
|  | Re: .5, .6
DRCS is a "long standing wish list item", but there are no specific plans
to implement it in a future version.  It's definitely something I'd like to
do if I had the time.
If you're really keen you could (in DECterm V2) create a BDF file with the
characters you want to define (using a character encoding of "DRCS"), compile
it with the DECwindows font compiler, copy it to the appropriate font
directory on the server, and then load it with a Select Character Set
escape sequence ending in SP @ (space, at-sign).
				-- Bob
 |