| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 748.1 | Fixed in UWS 2.1, I think | FLUME::dike |  | Tue May 09 1989 12:53 | 4 | 
|  | If they're running 2.0, the release notes contain instructions to fix
this problem.
				Jeff
 | 
| 748.2 |  | GILMOR::TESTA |  | Wed May 10 1989 16:37 | 3 | 
|  | I looked in the release notes and made a test case with my own calloc function.
It did not fix the problem.  
 | 
| 748.3 | Do they have their own version of malloc? | ENXIO::thomas | The Code Warrior | Wed May 10 1989 17:02 | 2 | 
|  | If so, have them create there own version of calloc and cfree as well.
 | 
| 748.4 |  | GILMOR::TESTA |  | Wed May 10 1989 17:19 | 14 | 
|  | I did find the information in the release note for V2.1.
I tried the following on my test program, and did not get the conflict.   
 ar x /lib/libc.a calloc.o 
 cc program.c calloc.o -lX11    and I added -lcursesX
Hoepfully this  will fix ther problem.
Thanks
 |