[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | ARCHIVE-- Topics of Interest to Women, Volume 2 --ARCHIVE | 
| Notice: | V2 is closed.  TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open. | 
| Moderator: | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | 
|  | 
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1986 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 30 1995 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 1105 | 
| Total number of notes: | 36379 | 
976.0. "Individual/collective responsibility" by ULTRA::WRAY (John Wray, Secure Systems Development) Mon Feb 05 1990 23:42
    I've been reading some notes, here and in other conferences, that set
    me thinking (a rare enough occurence of itself).  I often read things
    along the lines of:
    
    "Blaming <and-therefore-treating> `society' for
    <insert-favorite-problem-here> is just a way of abdicating personal
    responsibility".
    
    I have seen this sort of thing said in the context of male -> female
    violence, rape, violence in general, drug abuse, random breath-tests
    for drivers, gun-control, anti-discrimination legislation, and many
    others.
    
    The general argument is that treating society affects every individual,
    irrespective of whether or not they have demonstrated a need for
    "treatment", and is therefore undesirable.
    
    So when does a problem become something that must be addressed at a
    societal level?  When does `society' have to be changed (either by
    legislation or by education - and what are the relative benefits of
    these options?) in order to eliminate a problem, or can
    treating/punishing only individuals who have demonstrated clear guilt
    always solve every problem?  Is "blaming society" for a problem
    abdicating individual responsibility, or is is accepting collective
    responsibility?
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|