| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 231.1 | I agree! | JJM::ASBURY |  | Thu Oct 06 1988 13:49 | 14 | 
|  |     Very Interesting! And I agree with much of what was in .0. In fact,
    a couple of weeks ago, I was having a discussion about one of those
    topics - use of profanity. I was talking to a fellow student in
    one of my evening MBA classes at Babson College (Wellesley, MA).
     
    Somehow, swearing at work was brought up. This fellow student, Brian,
    claimed that swearing at work, if done at the right time, ie sparingly
    and to make a strong point, could be very beneficial. It would tend
    to cause the 'swearing manager' to be taken more seriously.
    
    After some discussion, we agreed that this is less true for women
    in business than for men.
    
    -Amy.
 | 
| 231.2 | Profanity is not need, nor appreciated. | SUCCES::ROYER | Fidus Amicus | Thu Oct 06 1988 15:24 | 13 | 
|  | Amy,
Swearing and profanity in my opinion are just crutches people use
when they cannot find the proper word to use in the situation.
In other words, the usage of language that is not proper is the
sign of a mental cripple, whether male or female.
No malice intended, just stating an opinion.
:-)
Dave
 | 
| 231.3 | use of language, indeed | TFH::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Thu Oct 06 1988 16:47 | 14 | 
|  |     re .2:
    
    > ...the usage of language that is not proper is the sign of a mental
    > cripple, ...
    
    > No malice intended, ...
    
    These two statements are contradictory.
                                                   
                  /
                 (  ___
                  ) ///
                 /
                       
 | 
| 231.4 |  | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Thu Oct 06 1988 17:09 | 5 | 
|  | I'd like to see the same survey on men, to have something to compare it against
(besides my personal experience).
I swear plenty.
	Mez
 | 
| 231.6 | Is this going to be another rathole? | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | That was Zen; this is Dao | Fri Oct 07 1988 02:48 | 19 | 
|  |     � Swearing and profanity in my opinion are just crutches people
    use when they cannot find the proper word to use in the situation. �
    
    Sometimes the "profane" word *is* the "proper word to use in the
    situation". So what do you do then?
    
    � In other words, the usage of language that is not proper is the
    sign of a mental cripple... �
    
    By whose definition of propriety?  You may believe that some words
    are "improper", but I don't. So why should I be bound by your rules
    of propriety?
        
    Words is words. *Ideas* may be profane or smutty or whatever you
    want to call it, but the words aren't. To me, there's no difference
    between "feces" and "shit". We're talking about the same substance,
    so why is one word acceptable and the other not?
    
    --- jerry
 | 
| 231.7 |  | HANDY::MALLETT | Foole | Fri Oct 07 1988 13:11 | 13 | 
|  |     I suspect that the idea behind the profanity question refers
    more to regular or constant use those "nasty" words.  My
    experience tells me that for both men and women, the occasional
    profanity doesn't undermine a professional image while regular
    or constant usage does.  Actually, from what I've seen in 
    Manufacturing,� a woman has a bit more leeway as profanity
    from a woman is often interpretted by males as a sign of
    "toughness", an attribute of great value in Mfg.
    
    Steve
    
    � admittedly, an, um, unusual place. . .
    
 | 
| 231.8 | and from the man in the know (so he sez) | NOETIC::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Fri Oct 07 1988 14:29 | 16 | 
|  | 
       Concerning the dress code for aspiring pros...
       In a recent article about J.T. Molloy (mr dress for sucess) he
       stated that most recent fashion mags have been misleading women
       saying that they may wear dresses to work and be respected. He
       says this is only true of women dominated fields. Otherwise
       ladies, you must suit up.
       He also claims that dark colors are mandatory (and I wear pink
       80% of the time, so much for my sucess). A quote from Molloy...
       "Dark colors mean authority...that's why IBM executives and
       Hell's Angels wear dark clothes".
       liesl
 | 
| 231.9 |  | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | That was Zen; this is Dao | Sat Oct 08 1988 03:58 | 14 | 
|  |     With regard to dress, I disagree with the idea of dressing for
    the job one aspires to. It's far better to dress for the job
    one is currently in.
    
    Some years back, I had a woman working for me who seemed to
    feel that "dressing up" was the way to go -- though I confess
    that I'm not sure whether it was because she just liked dressing
    up or she felt it would help her "get ahead". Regardless, a
    fancy dress and high heels was *not* what I consider appropriate
    dress for a computer operator (and, working third shift, she
    wouldn't have had much of a chance to impress upper management
    with her "professionalism").
    
    --- jerry
 | 
| 231.10 | the job you're in | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Oct 11 1988 13:33 | 13 | 
|  |     re: .9
    
    Sounds like she probably just felt more comfortable dressing up. 
    I tend to agree about dressing for the job you're in now. If you
    want to be taken seriously in an engineering environment as
    someone with technical knowledge, you hadn't better wear anything
    much fancier than a sweater and slacks.  Someone, male or female,
    who wore suits regularly would have to go several extra steps to
    establish that he or she knew what she was talking about
    technically and wasn't just spouting management jargon. 
    
    --bonnie
 |