| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 591.1 |  | 38636::AUGUSTINE | What do humanitarians eat? | Fri Dec 11 1987 16:29 | 16 | 
|  |     Dave,
    I essentially agree with you. i think that it would help if the
    moderators stepped in a little more often. i also think that the
    mods are at one end of the spectrum, while "fascists" are at the
    other. i don't think that either of us are asking them to slide
    to the other end.
    
    liz
    
    p.s. oh no! now people are going to leave because we're talking about
    process again!  arrrgh!
    
    p.p.s. i'd once again like to thank bonnie and maggie for the job
    they've done.
    
 | 
| 591.2 |  | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopless but not serious | Fri Dec 11 1987 17:20 | 12 | 
|  |     Me too, Dave.  Although I personally don't find myself getting
    rattled by much that goes on here (having served time in the
    Army, prison, and manufacturing tends to toughen one's skin
    a tad. . .), I nonetheless think that the conference in general
    would benefit by a little more intervention.  This, to me, is
    a reflection of how Bonnie and Maggie have moderated to date.  
    I think they've repeatedly demonstrated fairness, cool-
    headedness, and compassion and I therefore trust their judegements
    in moderating both implicitly and explicitly. 
    
    Steve
    
 | 
| 591.4 |  | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Sat Dec 12 1987 19:35 | 1 | 
|  |     thank you Gale...you expressed my personal feelings very well
 | 
| 591.5 |  | 2B::ZAHAREE | This buffer ain't big enough for the both of us! | Sat Dec 12 1987 22:50 | 5 | 
|  |     RE .3:
    
    I thought "argh" had an "r" in it.
    
    - M
 | 
| 591.7 | ARRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH! | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at large | Mon Dec 14 1987 09:39 | 37 | 
|  |     I am firmly convinced that people who ask for more moderator
    action are people with no idea what so ever of what it takes
    to moderate a conference of this nature.
    
    Two quick points.
    
    1) Maggie and Bonnie spend far more time moderating this file then
       most of you have any idea of. Moderating a file like this is
       far more then just reading every note and hiding and moving things
       when they get out of hand. There are constant questions (by mail
       and phone) from new Noters. There is regular handling of complaints
       against individuals and Notes. There is regular mediation (by
       phone, visit, mail) between people who's Notes disagreements
       spread into real life. Well, I could go on, but you get the picture.
       [I'm assuming this describes what Bonnie and Maggie go through
       based on my experience moderating Valuing Differences conferences.
       I'm sure they'll correct me if they have it easier then this.]
    
    2) Over moderation always backfires. Believe me I've been there.
       It is a fast way to destroy a conference and moderators. In fact,
       is a race to see which dies first.
    
>        However, it is my *personal opinion* that perhaps a little moderator
>    fascism might cool things off.  
       Sure and pouring gasoline will put out fires too. I promise this
       will *not* work!
    
    
    One last hint. You don't have to be a moderator to suggest that
    people cool down. You don't have to be a moderator to act as a
    peace maker. You don't have to be a moderator to NEXT NOTE or NEXT
    UNSEEN.
    
    	signed-
    		a burnt out moderator    
 |