| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 352.1 | Official Response | RAINBO::TARBET | Margaret Mairhi | Thu Jun 25 1987 21:01 | 6 | 
|  |     um, if your "can we spill out..." means "may we..." or "is it okay
    to..." then yes, by all means.  Simply because life is often no joke
    doesn't mean we oughtn't to laugh whenever we can. 
    
    					in Sisterhood,
    					=maggie
 | 
| 352.2 |  | USFSHQ::SMANDELL | Yes, I *can* have it my way! | Fri Jun 26 1987 08:48 | 5 | 
|  |     Re .0
    
    Wow!  What a novel idea!!!
    
    SM
 | 
| 352.6 |  | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Fri Jun 26 1987 12:22 | 3 | 
|  |     Kerry, nothing humorous of yours has ever been deleted from
    HUMAN_RELATIONS.
    				Steve
 | 
| 352.8 | may i ask ? | PRESTO::MITCHELL | Lady | Fri Jun 26 1987 12:28 | 4 | 
|  |     re .6
    
    How is humor determined ? Is it at the discretion of the 
    moderator ? 
 | 
| 352.10 | Insults are not funny | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Fri Jun 26 1987 14:32 | 19 | 
|  |     Re: .8
    
    The only notes which get returned to the author from HUMAN_RELATIONS
    are those which the moderators find inappropriate for the conference.
    These typically are notes that insult other noters.  Often those
    doing the insulting think they are being funny, and assume that
    if they put a smiley-face on a slur that they are instantly
    immune.
    
    HUMAN_RELATIONS has three active moderators, each with somewhat
    different views on life, and we prefer to try to work with noters
    to revise their contributions rather than simply deleting them.
    For most people this works well, for others it does not.
    
    I am sorry I haven't kept a history of those notes we've had to
    return to Mr. Faulkner so I could illustrate my point.  But I expect
    that as other notes read enough of his notes, they'll understand.
    
    					Steve
 | 
| 352.12 | Who B Der? | NSG008::MILLBRANDT | Think Feisty | Fri Jun 26 1987 16:42 | 11 | 
|  | 
    Re: .9 and .11
    
    Hold on a minute!  I liked .9!  Keep "not recognizing" things,
    Renee.  Take things at the face value as you see them, make up your
    own mind about people and their contributions.
    
    What's intriguing about notes is figuring out who is behind those
    names in the upper left hand corner.
    
    						- Dotsie
 | 
| 352.13 | Hummm...interesting | STING::BARBER | Skyking Tactical Services | Fri Jun 26 1987 17:14 | 6 | 
|  |     
     Gee ..you mean I can ask/ pose questions like the one I did
     about womens cold hands and feet and not get jumped on ..
     Sounds reasonable to me ....
    
                                 Bob B
 | 
| 352.14 | of course bob... | NCVAX1::COOPER | studette in action | Fri Jun 26 1987 17:21 | 4 | 
|  |     Mr. Barber, you can ask about t&a's for all i care.....
    
    
    then you might get jumped on :-)!!!!!
 | 
| 352.15 | we weren't born yesterday | NSG008::MILLBRANDT | Think Feisty | Fri Jun 26 1987 17:23 | 10 | 
|  | 
    re .13
    
    That was "take things at face value as you see them".  Leaves room
    for a little application of intelligence above a pure "face value".
    
    
    
    
    
 | 
| 352.16 | Reminds me of... | SSTMV1::BONNIE | BLA, not BRS or BLT | Fri Jun 26 1987 19:19 | 1 | 
|  |     Beauty is only skin deep, but ugly is to the bone!
 | 
| 352.17 | hey, I like that :) | CREDIT::RANDALL | I'm no lady | Wed Jul 01 1987 15:41 | 7 | 
|  |     re: .2 --
    
    SM, if that's a novel idea . . .
    
    maybe you should write a book!
    
    --bonnie :)
 |