| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 926.1 | | LJSRV2::JC | I'm the Pox Mon, yeeeah the Pox Mon | Thu Jan 02 1997 11:11 | 12 |
| 926.2 | Based on what data please? | NQOS01::lexyfi.lex.dec.com::isler | | Thu Jan 02 1997 15:27 | 13 |
| 926.3 | Implementations of 200-2000 size | GIDDAY::PARSONS | Punicenter Support | Thu Jan 02 1997 16:44 | 17 |
| 926.4 | | NQOS01::lexyfi.lex.dec.com::isler | | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:21 | 15 |
| 926.5 | 1 CPU but check with a pilot | GO4GUT::SYSTEM | Punicenter Support | Mon Jan 06 1997 19:31 | 9 |
| 926.6 | | LJSRV2::JC | I'm the Pox Mon, yeeeah the Pox Mon | Tue Jan 07 1997 08:37 | 11 |
| 926.7 | Tech-Ed + Tech-Net say 2; MS use 1 | ESSB::RJOYCE | | Mon Jan 27 1997 03:35 | 12 |
|
I'm involved in a rollout and we based on different inputs have
implemented SQL and SMS on two separate systems; managing an
environment of about 4k PCs, 400 UNIX systems and many Admin GUIs.
[Two alphas BTW, we were asked to spec large]
What may be of interest to you, is that about a week ago we got to meet
with a person involved in MS's own SMS environment in Europe. They are
using at central and lower levels single server systems. Their heaviest
system would be a Compaq Proliant Dual-Processor Pentium.
Richard
|