| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1241.1 | Washout Is A Good Idea | CLOSUS::TAVARES | John--Stay Low, Keep Moving! | Mon Sep 10 1990 17:46 | 14 | 
|  | As an expert crasher of airplanes, I wholeheartedly recommend
some washout.  I have about 1/2 inch in the PT40, per the
instructions, and it allows the plane to handle without tip
stalling well below the point where the ailerons, and even the
rudder, are ineffective.  In fact, this is my only criticism of
the plane; that it can be operated this slowly!
I'm doing a scale design now, from scratch, and will also put
washout into this plane's wing.  The only possible objection to
this is if the washout spoils the wing's scale appearance -- for
my plane, I don't think it'll be visible, for a Helldiver it may
be a problem.  On the other hand, I understand that warbirds in
general are notorious for tip stalling, so you pays your money
and takes your chances.
 | 
| 1241.2 | I'd use 2 to 3 degrees of washout in a scale bird | UPWARD::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) 551-5572 | Mon Sep 10 1990 18:08 | 20 | 
|  |     Ollie,
    
    Opinions on wahsout vary and good arguments can be made for both sides
    of the question.  I happen to prefer washout, _especially_ for highly
    wing-loaded scale models as it forces the wing center section to stall
    _before_ the tips.  This is highly desireable when landing and any
    other time your low and slow...a snap-roll into the ground with a nice scale
    ship really ruins yer' day!!
    
    My MiG-3 has 2 1/2 degrees of washout in the tips and I'd recommend
    using between 2-and-3 degrees in the Helldiver.  Consider 3-degrees the
    maximum as more than that produces too much drag and effectiveness is
    lost.  Besides, it begins to show beyond 3-degrees where it's very hard
    to spot the 2 1/2 degrees in the MiG.
						 __
				|      |        / |\	   	       
      	         \|/		|______|__(o/--/  | \	   	       
      | |        00	       <|  ~~~  ____ 04 ---- | --------------------
    |_|_|        (O>o		|\)____/___|\_____|_/	   Adios amigos, Al
      |     \__(O_\_	        |	  |___/	 o	   (The Desert Rat)
 | 
| 1241.3 | USE OF WASHOUT | FDCV27::P01YATES |  | Tue Sep 11 1990 08:36 | 8 | 
|  |     Al, this is gooood information.  Please let me beg some more from you.
    
    Is the 2 1/2 degrees measure at the trailing edge of the wing tip??? 
    Why not use a decimal measurement (e.g., 1.2 inches)?? 
    
    Regards, 
    
    Ollie
 | 
| 1241.4 | ROBART HAS THE ANSWER.... | UPWARD::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) 551-5572 | Tue Sep 11 1990 10:54 | 23 | 
|  |    Ollie,
    
    The reason I use degrees as a unit of measurement for washout is
    because the physical dimension will vary according to the wing size,
    regardless of whether you state it in inches, milimeters, parsecs or
    whatever.  :B^)  But, the 2-to-3 degrees stays constant irrespective of
    size.
    
    Yer' next question is gonna' be, "B---B---But how do I measure it?" 
    Simple; you go out and buy yer'self a Robart incidence meter ($20.00 or
    less mail-order) which every properly equipped shop should have anyway. 
    You can even use the meter on the building board and there's no need to
    zero or level anything...simply read the wing at the center-section and
    note the reading.  Now, block up the trailing edge near the tip 'til
    the meter reads 2-to-3 degrees more than the center-section reading. 
    Make sure you get both wings identical or you'll wind up with a
    built-in left or right bank.
						 __
				|      |        / |\	   	       
      	         \|/		|______|__(o/--/  | \	   	       
      | |        00	       <|  ~~~  ____ 04 ---- | --------------------
    |_|_|        (O>o		|\)____/___|\_____|_/	   Adios amigos, Al
      |     \__(O_\_	        |	  |___/	 o	   (The Desert Rat)
 | 
| 1241.5 | easy to calculate .... | GENRAL::KNOERLE |  | Tue Sep 11 1990 12:30 | 31 | 
|  |     
    	If you don't want to buy the device to measure the angle, you can
    	easily calculate what the hight of the trailing edge should be in
    	reference to the leading edge.
    
    	HEIGHT = tan a  x  WIDTH 	HEIGHT- difference in height to
    						leading edge [inch]
    					WIDTH - width of your wing at the
    						point of measurement [inch]
    					tan a - value 2.0 degree = 0.03492
    						      2.5 degree = 0.04366
    						      3.0 degree = 0.05240
                                        you find this on technical calculators
    					type <2.5><tan>, the display will
    					show 0.04366.
    
    	Example :  your wing is 10 inch wide at the tip (or close to the
   		   tip) - you want to have 2.5 degrees 
    
    		   The height at the trailing edge of the wing tip ( or
    		   close to) should be 
    
    		   0.04366 x 10 inch = 0.4366 inches above the wing center
    		   section
    
    	be careful to measure the center of the leading edge and the center
    	of the trailing edge in the wing center section being the same
   	height above your working surface.
    
    
    	Holm- und Rippenbruch,  Bernd
 | 
| 1241.6 | Washout Made Easy | FDCV27::P01YATES |  | Thu Sep 13 1990 10:34 | 17 | 
|  |     Mucho thanks for all the good information on how to build washout into
    the wing.
    
    It seems the more I get into the construction of the semi scale
    Helldiver, the more questons come up.
    
    Soooo, here's the next one on washout.  The tapered wing has both flaps
    and ailerons (which extend to the 2" solid balsa tip).
    
    Question:  Should I build any washout in the outside part of the ailron
    or should I just build washout into the 2" wing tip??
    
    Hope this question "grabs" you and prompts your response!!
    
    Regards,
    
    Ollie           
 | 
| 1241.7 | Washout is progressive and built in | UPWARD::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) 551-5572 | Thu Sep 13 1990 12:21 | 49 | 
|  |     Re: .-1, Ollie,
    
    Washout is a progressive thing, that is, it starts at the
    center-section or (in the case of a Hellcat, Hurricane, Dauntless,
    Mig-3 type wing) from the dihedral break and progressively increases
    out to the tip where it will measure the desired 2-to-3 degrees.
    
    What you'll want to do is lay up the wing with just the basic parts,
    i.e. lead and trail edges and maybe one upper and one lower spar.  But,
    glue the spar-to-rib joints lightly or not at all except for at the
    root and tip ribs.  Now, use the Robart Incidence Meter to determine
    how high to block up the trailing edge at the tip to attain 2-or-3
    degrees of washout measured at the tip.  Just for drill, let's say you
    need to raise the T.E. 3/4" to achieve the desired washout.  Cut
    identical blocks and precisely block up both tips at the T.E. the same
    3/4".  Double, triple, fourple-check both tips with the meter 'til
    satisfied they are identical.  The result should be that the T.E.
    begins to lift from the bench top almost immediately and lifts
    progressively higher all the way out to the tip.  What you've done is
    built in a deliberate warp/twist in both wing panels.
    
    You may find it necessary to go to extremes to keep the L.E. nailed
    down to the bench top.  This is why you want to block in the washout
    before too much structure is added; not only will it resist the twist
    yer' trying to achieve but, when added _after_ blocking in the washout,
    the subsequently added structure halps lock the twist in place
    permanently.  I recommend you recheck the washout frequently, like
    after adding each additional part, to assure that the twist is holding. 
    Once the wing is completed and sheeted, it's almost impossible to
    correct washout so be certain you get what you want as yer' stuck with
    whatever you get at this point.
    
    As you can imagine, building the ailerons and flaps into the blocked up
    wing forces these surfaces to follow the washout so, once the wing is
    complete, you just carefully cut them free and they should fit like a
    glove.
    
    BTW, it'd be almost impossible to build the washout into the 2" tip
    alone and, if you coupld, it'd look pretty silly and be ineffective
    anyway.  The 3/4" I used as an example is not exaggerated...you'll most
    likely block up the T.E. about that much to get 2-3 degrees of washout
    so I think you can appreciate that this amount must be distributed over
    the entire span, not just the last 2".  Hope this helps.
						 __
				|      |        / |\	   	       
      	         \|/		|______|__(o/--/  | \	   	       
      | |        00	       <|  ~~~  ____ 04 ---- | --------------------
    |_|_|        (O>o		|\)____/___|\_____|_/	   Adios amigos, Al
      |     \__(O_\_	        |	  |___/	 o	   (The Desert Rat)
 | 
| 1241.9 | For monokoted, open wings! | CURIE::ANKER | Anker Berg-Sonne | Mon Sep 17 1990 11:29 | 14 | 
|  |                 A quick haskout comment.
        
                Al's procedure  is  the  only way to build washout into a
        fully sheeted wing.  For a mainly monokoted wing there is another
        approach I would advocate:    I believe it is extremely inportant
        to build the wing straight  without bumps, burps and warps.  This
        is easiest if you start by  building it compeletely flat, without
        the washout.  To create the washout  I  cover  the  wing and then
        heat the monokote with an iron while overtwisting it until it has
        the  proper washout after cooling.  Using this approach  you  get
        exactly what Al insists you need:  a steadily increading  washout
        angle across the entire wing.
        
        Anker
 | 
| 1241.10 | Washout maintained by Monokote is unstable over time | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Kamikaze Eindecker pilot | Mon Sep 17 1990 11:52 | 11 | 
|  |     Al's method works just as well for an open structure, and is much more
    accurate and will maintain the washout better than relying on the
    covering....
    
    As the plane gets heated and cooled in your car or at the flying
    field, the covering (especially monokote) may lossen and  you
    will lose your washout..  What's more, you may only lose it in
    one wing...
    
    jeff
    
 |