| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1144.1 | Nashua Ward 6 | CLIPR::OUELLETTE |  | Thu Feb 20 1992 13:36 | 4 | 
|  |     Nashua Ward 6 Call
    
    Roland Lefebvre 888-2385
    James McDowell 883-3539
 | 
| 1144.2 | call now! | MCIS5::PAPPALARDO | A Pure Hunter | Thu Feb 20 1992 13:38 | 21 | 
|  |     
    For Salem, N.H. call:
    
    REPS                                 SENATOR
    
    Don Roulston 893-6549         Joseph Delehaunty 893-8049
                                           office   893-9134
    Arthur Smith 893-3842
    Donna Styek  893-8889
    John Styek same as above
    Beverly Gage 893-3126 or 898-5277
    Bernard Raynowski 898-9273
    Steve Bucco 898-4590
    Mary Campbell 898-7859
    Annette Cook 893-6653
    Bert Ford 898-2137
    
    The above is for district 20.
    
    Rick
    
 | 
| 1144.3 | $.02 | SA1794::CHARBONND | raw, cold, dead fish place | Thu Feb 20 1992 16:28 | 3 | 
|  |     If worse comes to worse, and the bill is unkillable, you might want to
    point out that Massachusetts gets along quite well with a 500 foot
    limit. (Which doesn't put much deer habitat out of bounds.)
 | 
| 1144.4 |  | ROULET::RINELLA |  | Fri Feb 21 1992 07:54 | 8 | 
|  |     
    
    
    Damn, I'm reading this note a day too late.. Is there any word on what
    happened to this bill yet???
    
    
    Gus
 | 
| 1144.5 |  | DATABS::STORM |  | Fri Feb 21 1992 10:42 | 7 | 
|  |     I just called.  The lady at the state house said it was in the F&G
    Committee.  The number she gave for them was 271-3125.  They are not
    there today, but she said they were planning to meet either Monday or
    Tuesday, so try calling that number then.
    
    Mark,
    
 | 
| 1144.6 | What  finally happened to this bill ? | LANDO::HOFFMAN |  | Mon Mar 16 1992 12:31 | 6 | 
|  | Guys/Gals,
Anybody know how this turned out ??
I certainly hope it was defeated.
Dave
 | 
| 1144.7 |  | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Wishin' I were Fishin' | Tue Mar 17 1992 08:48 | 3 | 
|  |  It was sent out of committee with an "inexpedient to legislate" recommendation
several weeks ago. The last I heard it was supposed to have been voted on by 
the full house, but I have seen no reports of what the outcome of that was.
 | 
| 1144.8 | defeated | DONMAC::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Tue Mar 17 1992 11:39 | 4 | 
|  |     The NH Wildlife Federation reports that it was defeated.
    
    -donmac
    
 | 
| 1144.9 |  | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Wishin' I were Fishin' | Tue Mar 17 1992 14:53 | 1 | 
|  |  <sniff> Gee, that's too bad.... NOT! :-)
 | 
| 1144.10 | How would the messure it? | APACHE::DAY |  | Wed Apr 15 1992 11:53 | 20 | 
|  |     
    	This would of messed my hunting up.  How in the world
    	though the woods could a person even know at times they were
    	1000 feet or more away from something.  I wonder how they
    	would message it.  A staight line or along the ground.  Some
    	ridges may put you 1000 feet along the ground but only
    	400 in a staight line.  The three hundred foot rule is a good
    	one.  It is based really on common sence.  Most times in the
    	woods around here the maximum distance you can see is 300 feet.
    	It is only common sence if you can see a home or town road to
    	unload or make a 180 and head back into the woods.
    
    	I am glad it did not pass.  The next time you hear of this type
    	of thing, please call me at home.  We have to stick together.
    
    	 424-5540.
    
    
    					Dave
    
 |