| Title: | The Hunting Notesfile | 
| Notice: | Registry #7, For Sale #15, Success #270 | 
| Moderator: | SALEM::PAPPALARDO | 
| Created: | Wed Sep 02 1987 | 
| Last Modified: | Tue Jun 03 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 1561 | 
| Total number of notes: | 17784 | 
    
    	SB961 will be coming up before the New Hampshire house shortly.
    	It is a bill designed to stop trapping.  It is sponsered by you
    	know who.  This bill is if passed will be looked upon as great
    	victory by the animal right activist as the first victory in
    	ending any gathering of wild game.  This includes hunting.  If
    	you live in New Hamphire and have not received your NRA alert
    	yet call your local representative.  The bill has already passed
    	the New Hampshire senate.  The Fish and Game commitee voted 
    	18 to 1 against it.  
    
    	I guess we are seeing another side of having a good business
    	outlook in New Hamshire.  We have attacted many animal rights
    	people into this state.  We must make a stand now or we may
    	loose later, remember also these people never give up.
    
    				Dave
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 954.1 | JIT???? | IRWIN::OUELLETTE | Tue Apr 30 1991 13:11 | 8 | |
| Boy I wish the NRA could inform us of this shit further in advance than it does. I got my mailing Saturday! and the votes today. I managed to call my representatives and none of the three said they supported it. Thank God! The bill is SB169 according to my NRA flier. As soon as someone finds out how it went or how to go about finding out, post it here. | |||||
| 954.2 | SPUDDS::MCKENZIE | Observe the masses,do the opposite. | Wed May 08 1991 07:41 | 7 | |
| I take it this bill didn't pass ? Otherwise we should've seen animal rights activists dancing in the streets and the media splashing it all over the 6:00pm news but since it's been quite ... Mark | |||||
| 954.3 | YES, A VICTORY | HURON::DAY | Fri May 10 1991 13:29 | 10 | |
|     
    	Yes, it was defeated a subsitute motion that it "ought to pass" was 
    	defeated by role call vote 231 to 111.  The bill its self was defeated
        by voice vote so no numbers are available.  
    
    	Keep the fight up on the Brady Bill.
    
    
    
    				Dave 
 | |||||