| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 846.1 | 60 per sq. mile | ODIXIE::RHARRIS |  | Wed Nov 07 1990 10:19 | 6 | 
|  |     I would think that you have more deer than that.  but then I don't know 
    new england hunting.  Here, In Georgia, the county I hunt, has
    approximately 60 deer per square mile.  Such is life.
    
    bob
    
 | 
| 846.2 |  | WAYBAK::LEFEBVRE | You are a fluke of the universe | Wed Nov 07 1990 11:10 | 10 | 
|  |     According the an article in this month's Maine Sportsman about the
    proliferation of the deer herd in the Cape Elizabeth area, there
    are appoximately 60 deer per square mile in that area which is about
    twice the average for the southern half of the state of Maine. 
    In other words, southern to central Maine averages about 30 deer
    per square mile.
    
    Northern Maine is less, but I don't have those figures.
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 846.3 | WHITE TAILED DEER | SALEM::HALE |  | Mon Nov 12 1990 13:49 | 21 | 
|  |     I MAYBE OF SOME HELP.
    
    I HAVE A MAP HERE ON MY WALL THAT GAVES A WHITE TAILED DEER DENSITIES
    NORTHERN MAINE IS  LESS THEN 15 DEER PER SQUARE MILE
    SOUTHERN MAINE IS  15 TO 30 DEER PER SQUARE MILE
    
    ALL OF N.H. IS   LESS THEN 15 DEER PER SQUARE MILE
    
    
    NORTHERN VERMONT  LESS THEN 15 DEER PER SQUARE MILE
    SOUTHERN VERMONT  15 TO 30 DEER PER SQUARE MILE
    
    MASS IS MOSTLY  LESS THEN 15 PER SQUARE MILE
    FAR WESTERN PART IS  15 TO 30 DEER PER SQUARE MILE
    AROUND THE CENTER OF THE STATE A SMALL AREA THEY SAY THEIR IS MORE THEN
    30 DEER PER SQUARE MILE
    
    HOPE THIS HELPS
    
    PAPPY
    
 | 
| 846.4 | How old is the map? | CHRLIE::HUSTON |  | Mon Nov 12 1990 15:30 | 11 | 
|  |     
    re .3, 
    
    How old is this map, it seems that the numbers don't match what the
    F&G are saying. Don't know exact numbers, but there are some pretty
    high deer densities in NH according to them. It was pretty scarce
    for a while though, is your map old or recent
    
    --Bob
    
    
 | 
| 846.5 |  | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | No artificial sweeteners | Tue Nov 13 1990 09:17 | 5 | 
|  |  Area A (Pittsburg) and area M (southeast NH) have high densities. With the 
number  of any deer days in those areas, I'd have to believe we're talking 15-30
per square mile in those areas.
 The Doctah
 | 
| 846.6 |  | SALEM::HALE |  | Tue Nov 13 1990 11:46 | 7 | 
|  |     
    I GOT THE MAP FROM A SPORTS AFIELD MAG, I THINK IT WAS 2-3 YEARS AGO
    NOT TO SURE.BUT LIKE YOU SAY THING DO CHANGE.
    
    
    PAPPY
    
 | 
| 846.7 | Poachers change these stats.!! | SA1794::BARTHELETTEJ |  | Tue Nov 13 1990 18:45 | 16 | 
|  |       I'd like to Thank all of you for your responces.  I tend to think
    that the reply stating - less than 15 deer/sq. mile is the accurate
    one for the part of Mass. that I'm hunting in.
    
      Some of my concern to know this information was to understand
    why there is so much less deer sign in these woods I hunt in compared
    to last year.  In talking to other hunters that hunt this same area,
    they told me that they beleive that because so much of this land
    has trails cut all through it, accessible with 4x4's, that they
    beleive it to be heavily poached. I HATE POACHERS !!!
    
      Anyway, that theory made good sense to me, unfortunately.  I would
    love to see Mass. and all other states pass laws to - jail and throw
    the key away to these vultures of our woods!!
    
                       Thanks again, Jeff
 |