| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 318.1 | | NETCAD::WOODFORD | TimeToFillTheDonuts! | Fri Mar 31 1995 15:39 | 28 |
|
Hamp, I'd come to your office and give you your own
*Italian Cheek Squeeze* farewell, but I fear I'll
just start bawling all over the place and run my
waterproof mascarra. :((
I am going to miss you SOOOOO MUCH!!! You've been
a great friend to me. Your days here at LKG were pretty
short lived, but they made my days so much brighter.
Now, I have to go through my days with no more 'Hamp Hugs'
plastered all over my office. :((( I will always cherish
the little purple and orange number you sent me via
inter-office mail. It shall hang on my office wall wherever
that office may be. The orange has faded to yellow, but the
memory will remain vivid forever.
MAJOR*BIG*HUGS*AND*KISSES
Terrie
:(((((
'
'
'
'
'
'
|
| 318.2 | | KAOFS::C_PLANT | It had to be you... | Fri Mar 31 1995 15:43 | 8 |
|
Awwww now that was emotional!! got me going :(
'
'
'
|
| 318.3 | | ECADSR::HAMPTON | I'm Mr. Mom! Hear me Roar! | Fri Mar 31 1995 15:44 | 6 |
| Me too. me too.
Hamp
|
| 318.4 | | NETCAD::WOODFORD | TimeToFillTheDonuts! | Fri Mar 31 1995 15:55 | 8 |
|
Now I have another thing to cherish......balloon hugs!!!! :*)
Terrie
|
| 318.5 | very brief visit | CHEFS::WARRENJ | Now something completely different | Fri Mar 31 1995 16:19 | 4 |
|
Hugs n buttonflys, Hamp!
Jackie
|
| 318.6 | | KAOFS::C_PLANT | It had to be you... | Fri Mar 31 1995 17:36 | 10 |
|
re -1
are your briefs showing Hamp? that was a brief visit!!
button that fly up!! :))))
Chris
:)
|
| 318.7 | | VNABRW::MUDRA_M | Don't think I can't stand it | Fri Mar 31 1995 18:04 | 5 |
| Bye Hamp & all the best!
Tina
|
| 318.8 | gone, but not ... | NAC::LUSSIER | | Fri Mar 31 1995 19:37 | 8 |
|
A sad note from LKG :
Ladies and Gentlemen, HAMP has left the building !
|
| 318.9 | | SUBPAC::SADIN | One if by LAN, two if by C | Wed Apr 12 1995 19:40 | 7 |
|
Just a minor note folks....hamps address is NOT case sensitive.
Just sent him mail in all lowercase and it went through just fine...
chico
|
| 318.10 | | NETCAD::WOODFORD | I<--TheInfoWentDataWay-->I | Wed Apr 12 1995 22:39 | 10 |
|
Yup, I just found that out too. It wasn't the case
that was the problem the first time I sent him mail.
It was my spelling.... :*) Sorry...
Terrie
.
|
| 318.11 | | ADCA01::RAVISHANKAR | ToeUnderTruck=BIGNailCut | Thu Apr 13 1995 04:21 | 8 |
|
Re: last 3..
I don't think Internet addresses are case sensistive at all.. ( ie:
any and every).... no exceptions... *8)
Ravi.
*8)
|
| 318.12 | to CASE or to case... | POOKY::OROURKE | SLEEP...I read about that once | Thu Apr 13 1995 14:27 | 8 |
|
RE: Case Sensitivity: I've been told that UNIX machines can balk at
case.....
Could just be a nasty rumour! :^)
/jen
|
| 318.13 | | RANGER::REITH | | Thu Apr 13 1995 15:11 | 4 |
| Unix machines will balk at case for passwords, I do know that. Few people use
mixed case so it makes for a harder to guess password if you do.
Cm
|