| Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation | 
| Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI | 
| Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 | 
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 2259 | 
| Total number of notes: | 8590 | 
    Hello,
    
    A customer has a DEFPA installed in a Alpha running VMS V6.1-1h2,
    Decnet iv was running using fwa-0 line & circuit names. The customer
    then upgraded to VMS V6.2 & then VMS V6.2-1h2. 
    
    After doing this, when they tried to "set line fwa-0 state on" in ncp
    they got the following error:-
    
    "invalid identification format name"
    
    I got the customer to re run netconfig and the commands that were run
    in this file were using "FPA-0" as the line & circuit type.
    
    After using this name (FPA-0), Decnet started ok.
    
    Does anyone know where this line & circuit name are picked up from?
    Has it changed in the later versions of VMS?
    
    Any help appreciated.
    
    Regards,
    
    Jon Ward
    
    UK CSC Comms.                                      
    
    
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2081.1 | 19584::STOCKDALE | Wed Jul 10 1996 06:52 | 6 | ||
| >> Has it changed in the later versions of VMS? The DEFPA wasn't supported in V6.1 (although an unsupported driver was given out for people desperate to use the DEFPA). - Dick | |||||
| 2081.2 | What about V6.1-1h2? | COMICS::WARDJ | Thu Jul 11 1996 05:48 | 18 | |
|     Thanks for the reply Dick,
    
    Was it supported in VMS V6.1-1h2 ?
    
    From stars, it shows the following:-
    
    System Type    Bus    Controller      Driver       Circuit/Line
    
                   PCI      DEFPA      SYS$FWDRIVER        FWA-0 
    
    But netconfig picked up the circuit/line type of FPA-0 and I wondered
    if this could have been changed in some way by the customer, and if so
    where.
    
    Regards,
    
    Jon
     
 | |||||
| 2081.3 | 19584::STOCKDALE | Fri Jul 12 1996 15:04 | 6 | ||
| >> Was it supported in VMS V6.1-1h2 ? It looks like it was supported there. But the correct circuit name wasn't selected until V6.2. - Dick | |||||