| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 2061.1 | Have heard to keep TTRT value close to default.... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | Don't use time/words carelessly | Mon Jun 10 1996 17:40 | 13 | 
|  |     Well, I recall that varying the value of TTRT can affect 
    (sometime dramatically), the ultilization and latency of a 
    very busy FDDI ring, and that it has little affect on utilization 
    or latency on a lightly loaded ring. I don't have any personal 
    experience with changing this parameter from its default of 8ms 
    to an order of magnitude in the range of 160ms, so I can't speak 
    to whether this is useful or not. However I have heard many people 
    more knowlegeable than I of FDDI configs, not recommend changing it 
    too far from its default.
    Perhaps others can chime in here with more empirical evidence of
    the impact of changing it by a factor of 20.
    
    Bob
 | 
| 2061.2 |  | NETCAD::STEFANI |  | Mon Jun 10 1996 17:57 | 23 | 
|  |     >>                   -< TTRT significance for DEFPA? >-
    
    Most of the DEFEA and DEFPA device drivers offer a switch to change the
    MACRequestedTTRT value whose range is 4-165ms and whose default is 8ms.
    Note the word "Requested".
    
    The TTRT is negotiating via a lowest bidder wins algorithm during the
    FDDI claim process.  If one node asks for 8ms and another node asks for
    4ms, the 4ms. node wins.
    
    Raj Jain wrote a paper on why the 8ms. default is a good idea and
    should be left alone.  The reason many of our device drivers allow you
    to change the requested value is because end nodes are inherently
    difficult to manage.  Some FDDI network managers that want to twiddle
    with the TTRT value indiscriminantly set the end node requested values
    to something very high (eg. 160ms).  Now, for all intents and purposes
    the end node FDDI adapters are out of the bidding process.  They can
    then adjust the requested value at something more manageable (eg. bridge
    or concentrator) and know that they'll win the negotiation.
    
    Generally, this value should be left alone.
    
    - Larry
 | 
| 2061.3 |  | OTOOA::JPOND |  | Tue Jun 11 1996 10:18 | 6 | 
|  |     Larry,
    Thanks for the info.  I looked for Raj's paper at 
    FILES::NET$ARCH:[PAPERS]FDDI_PERF.PS, but it seems to be
    missing.  Do you have a current pointer?
    
    Jim
 | 
| 2061.4 |  | NETCAD::STEFANI |  | Tue Jun 11 1996 12:31 | 3 | 
|  |     >>missing.  Do you have a current pointer?
    
    Nope.
 | 
| 2061.5 |  | 12368::thomas | The Code Warrior | Tue Jun 11 1996 12:45 | 1 | 
|  | It's there now (FILES::NET$ARCH:[PAPERS]FDDI_PERF.PS).
 | 
| 2061.6 |  | OTOOA::JPOND |  | Tue Jun 11 1996 18:18 | 2 | 
|  |     Thanks,
    Jim
 |