|  |     Mark,
    
    The only insight I can offer is based on a couple of tests run in "Data
    Communications (July 1994)" and "Network Computing (April 1994)" magazines.
    
    In the April test, they ran Cisco, Sun, Network Perhiperals and
    Interphase cards against each other.  The clear winner in terms of
    performance and value was the Cisco card.  The Sun card was fast but
    expensive and had a fairly serious flaw.  It caused the ring to
    continuously reset....Sun blamed the problems on an AT&T chip on the
    card.
    
    In the July test, they ran a Cisco FDDI Sbus Adapter-Turbo against a 
    Network Peripherals card (the NP-SBS-S10) and the Cisco adapter 
    outperformed the NP card at all frame sizes.  Pricing on the two cards
    was very comparable and is dependent on the media type and whether they 
    were DAS or SAS.
    
    While these tests are over a year old, I suspect the test data is still
    valid.  Cisco came out the clear winner in both tests.
    
    Brian Pituley
    NPC, Calgary
    
                     
 | 
|  |     I have a customer that has been using the Sun card.  Try to avoid that
    one as like Brian said, it doesn't work too well.
    
    The other side of the coin is that depanding on the model of the Sun,
    you may only get 4-5 MB (bytes) per second out of a Sun doing NFS. 
    Their code seems to have a strangle hold on the processor and my
    customer is considering putting in 2 or 3 NIC cards to get the
    performance up near FDDI speeds.
    
    dave
 |