| Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
| Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
| Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2259 |
| Total number of notes: | 8590 |
I found a dual homing configuration as below in the video 'FDDI primer'.
When a trouble occurs between CON2 and CON3, does the standby line of DAS1
work ?
I think :
Even if the line between CON2 and CON3 is cut, M-B path between CON3 and DAS1
is active. So, CON3, DAS1 and SAS2 will make up another ring.
Am I wrong ?
A +------+ B A +------+ B Dual Ring
=====| CON1 |=========| CON2 |===========
+------+ +------+
M| |M M|
| | | <-- If the problem occurs at this point...
S| | B|
+----+ | +--------+
|SAS1| | | CON3 |
+----+ | +--------+
| M| |M
| | |
| B| |S
| A+----+ +----+
+--------|DAS1| |SAS2|
+----+ +----+
Regards,
Katsube
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1630.1 | NETCAD::STEFANI | Welcome to the Revolution! | Mon Mar 20 1995 07:40 | 15 | |
>>I found a dual homing configuration as below in the video 'FDDI primer'.
>>When a trouble occurs between CON2 and CON3, does the standby line of DAS1
>>work ?
No.
>>Even if the line between CON2 and CON3 is cut, M-B path between CON3 and DAS1
>>is active. So, CON3, DAS1 and SAS2 will make up another ring.
>>Am I wrong ?
I believe you're correct. Dual-homing cut-over is based on the current
device B and A ports and does not look "down the road" to see what
connections were cut.
/l
| |||||