| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1175.1 |  | SSDEVO::PARRIS | The SLED is dead, long live RAID | Wed Dec 08 1993 14:58 | 4 | 
|  | This is legal and will work.
VAX systems which have an XMI bus, Q-bus, or TURBOchannel can also be connected
directly to FDDI, of course.
 | 
| 1175.2 |  | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, B-16504 | Wed Dec 08 1993 16:52 | 3 | 
|  | ... or EISA (oh yes, that's Alpha only)...
	paul
 | 
| 1175.3 | Thanks to .1 and .2 | EEMELI::SOHLMAN | Jouko Sohlman CS/PTG Helsinki Finland | Thu Dec 09 1993 01:40 | 0 | 
| 1175.4 | More about DECbridge600 | EEMELI::SOHLMAN | Jouko Sohlman CS/PTG Helsinki Finland | Mon Dec 27 1993 07:44 | 18 | 
|  | 	Hello !
	Could somebody explain what does the figures about forwarding and
	filtering rates mean when you talk about DECbridge620 with
	three ethernets. (Forwarding rate/ethernet???)
	
	In the materials I have the figures are:
	Filtering rate  = 480.000 pps
	Forwarding rete =  22.000 p (Not so good if you calculate it per
				      ethernet == 7.400 pps/eth. !!!!)
	Also posted to decnet and FDDI-notes
				Jouko
 | 
| 1175.5 | 22k forwarding is enough for real-world apps | NOTAPC::LEVY |  | Thu Dec 30 1993 11:45 | 12 | 
|  |     Filtering rate of ~480k packets is worst-case (all min size packets) on
    all four ports.
    
    Forwarding rate of ~22k packets is obviously less than the worst-case
    rate of ~45k packets. The DECbridge was originally designed to support
    one Ethernet, not three. However, 22k is completely adequate for almost
    all real-world applications. Only back-to-back packets shorter than
    ~120 bytes (simultaneously on all three ports) would exceed the 22k
    figure.
    
    There is a white paper available which explains in much more detail
    why 22k forwarding isn't a relevant performance limitation.
 |