|  | I'm surprised it would say that.
It makes perfect sense as a guideline, but it is NOT valid as a restriction.
If you want to build "straightforward" configurations, guidelines are helpful
in constructing valid networks without lots of analysis or measurement.  But
the actual rules are those defined in the ANSI standard, and those are
expressed in terms of distance, loss, and bandwidth.  
If the configuration meets the loss and bandwidth requirements (and distance,
in the MMF case, though that's specified primarily to help guarantee the
other two) then it is legitimate.  In particular, splices and patches are
sources of loss, so if you have a lot of them you MAY have a loss problem.
So measure it.  If the measurement says ok, it's ok.
	paul
 | 
|  |     You also have a multi-vendor situation to deal with in terms of
    understanding the limits of the power budget and system bandwidth.
    
    I called Synoptics (1-800-PRO-NTWK) and asked about the limits of their
    SMF product. They support 20 km maximum link lengths. We support up to
    40 km link lengths, so I believe there is no bandwidth limitation with
    this shorter distance of 10 miles (16 km).   The optical transmit 
    power of their device is -20 dBm (minimum) and the receiver sensitivity
    is -31 dBm (minimum).
    
    Using these values and the corresponding numbers for our product (-8
    dBm and -30 dBm), the worst case power budget occurs between their 
    transmitter (-20 dBm) and our receiver (-30),  providing 10 dB for a 
    loss budget.  If the customers installation has less than 10 dB of 
    loss, including fiber, patch panels, etc, then the link should work.
    
    We have an installation guide for our single-mode products that
    contains more detail. I think there is a note in this conference that
    points to on on-line location. If not, let me know and I'll post it.
    
    
    Richard Kirk
    Networks Engineering
    Optical PMD Project Leader
    LEVERS::KIRK
    DTN 226-7048
 |