| Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
| Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
| Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2259 |
| Total number of notes: | 8590 |
I would like to know if there are customer sites that have both Fibronics'
and Digital FDDI equipment, if they co-exist peacefully, if they
interopate well, what Fibronics and Digital equipment are using etc.
I know of one site in Asia and will post finding once I have full details.
I hope others will share their experience in here as well.
Faraday
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 528.1 | FIBRONICS BRIDGE | WARP5::HUTCHINSON | Hutch | Tue Apr 07 1992 11:12 | 7 |
Faraday, I was involved in a customer interoperability test involving a FIBRONICS translating bridge model FX8210-XE, a DECconcentrator 500, and a DECbridge 620. We experienced no problems and the customer is currently deploying a large campus FDDI backbone using equipment from both vendors. | |||||
| 528.2 | SUBWAY::BRIGGS | Have datascope, will travel. | Tue Apr 14 1992 08:07 | 6 | |
Long ago, there was some competitive information from the DEC FDDI
marketing people indicating that the Fibronics equipment became a
bottleneck at a very low traffic level, say under 10 Mbps. I remember
getting this stuff at a NetU, but you might want to contact prod mkting
for info as to whether this is still true.
| |||||