| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 500.1 |  | MIPSBX::thomas | The Code Warrior | Mon Mar 16 1992 10:34 | 30 | 
|  | >    1. What is the max input data rate the workstation will sustain using
>    FDDI with TCP/IP and UDP/IP?
Depends on the application and how CPU you want left to do real work.
   
>    2. What configuration are available? SAS/DAS?  (FDDIc 700 is SAS, DC500
>    is DAS, right?)
The DEFZA is SAS only.
   
>    3. Is the workstation a claiming station?  That is does it participate
>    in network initialization? (We do this only in the DC500, right?)
I'll punt on this one.
    
>    4. Is the TTRT (target token rotation time) programmable?
Yes (on OSF/1, no on ULTRIX V4.2A or earlier, maybe on next ULTRIX release)
    
>    5. Is the synchronous transmission time slice programmable?
No.  The OSF/1 environment on provides support for async LLC frames.
   
>    6. Does the workstation support asynchronous FDDI transmission?
Yes.   
>    7. How much data buffering is provided by TCP and UDP?
Upto 64KB-1 per endpoint, default is 16KB per endpoint. 
 | 
| 500.2 |  | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, NI1D | Mon Mar 16 1992 11:18 | 8 | 
|  | (3) ALL FDDI stations participate in Claim; the standard requires that.
    (Don't confuse FDDI with 802.5, which has specialized "monitor" stations;
    FDDI has nothing in common with 802.5.)
(5) Note that IP does not use synch service (RFC 1188 says so explicitly).
    For that matter, neither does any other standard protocol I know of.
	paul
 | 
| 500.3 | but it's closer than Ethernet... | NAC::GULICK | Those dirty rings !! | Tue Mar 24 1992 13:14 | 14 | 
|  | re. -1
            <<< Note 500.2 by KONING::KONING "Paul Koning, NI1D" >>>
<<(3) ALL FDDI stations participate in Claim; the standard requires that.
<<    (Don't confuse FDDI with 802.5, which has specialized "monitor" stations;
<<    FDDI has nothing in common with 802.5.)
	just to keep you honest Paul, all 802.5 stations are capable of being
	monitor stations and therefor will participate in the 802.5-version
	of Claim Token aka monitor contention
	"nothing in common" is a little too strong...
	-tom
 | 
| 500.4 |  | KONING::KONING | Paul Koning, NI1D | Tue Mar 24 1992 22:14 | 9 | 
|  |     Oh, ok.
    
    To be fair, FDDI does have two things in common with 802.5:
    
    	"token" and "ring".
    
    but that's all.
    
    	paul
 | 
| 500.5 | System for Benching? | HXOU01::RUBINGER | Midvale School for the Gifted | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:25 | 15 | 
|  |     Thanks to all who responded.  I have forwarded the info to the
    customer.  They are, however, still insisting on some form of
    throughput measurement.
    The customer has a "benchmark" that they claim measures IP network
    throughput.  They would like to run it on DECstation 5000/240s
    connected via FDDI, doing nothing else to see what the upper limit on
    throughput could be.  
    Is there anyone out there with a config similar to the above that would
    be willing to run the customer's code?
    Thanks and regards,
    John Rubinger
    
 |