| Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
| Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
| Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2259 |
| Total number of notes: | 8590 |
I have a customer (a Utility company) looking towards disaster and
contingency planning and wanting to split clusters over 2 sites approx.
7 miles apart. FDDI clustering would appear to be a very attractive
longer-term goal to aim for.
My questions :-
Is there a standard for monomode fibres for use over longer distances
or has this yet to be argued/discussed/agreed ?
If there is a cable our customers can install now (or soon) can they
use it for other protocols and equipment, like Ethernet and Bridges for
instance, while they wait for the suppliers to provide the various
hardware/software ? Or is it likely that the cable and distances will
not be suitable ?
Any inputs may be useful to help us guide and influence the customer in
this work.
In this instance the customer MAY be able to instal FDDI with repeaters
every 2km installed at their various "outlets"/locations between the
sites.
Thanks in advance
Rog
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 149.1 | Longer distances over MMF - No | AKO569::JOY | Get a life! | Fri Oct 05 1990 14:34 | 10 |
The only way the customer will be able to go that distance without
"repeaters" along the way is by using Single Mode Fiber. I don't
believe this type of fiber could be used by any of the Ethernet-based
products so they would need to install it "dark". The SMF fiber
support should be available before the CLusters-over-FDDI support so
depending on their timeframe for installation, they may just want to
wait.
Debbie
| |||||
| 149.2 | KONING::KONING | NI1D @FN42eq | Wed Oct 10 1990 14:34 | 5 | |
The use of repeaters is almost certainly a bad idea. Depending on precisely what you mean by "repeater" it may not work at all, or it may work some of the time but be very unreliable. paul | |||||