| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 595.1 | Bylaw audit complete | PLOUGH::KINZELMAN | Paul Kinzelman | Thu Aug 06 1992 13:04 | 4 |
| I've audited the bylaws and found a few places where our bylaws were not
in compliance with the NCUA requirements. What I've posted now has those
places fixed. I've also changed the special meeting requirements
to 200/1000 because we've received work back from the NCUA of their approval.
|
| 595.2 | | VMSDEV::FERLAN | DECamds progress in revolution | Thu Oct 08 1992 09:33 | 10 |
|
I must say, that a pointer to copy would have been much nicer... I
can't imagine what those people who extract notes nightly have just
gone through with two topics (3.1,3.2) with over 1200 lines each!
And the poor DECwindows Notes people, just filling the buffer can
take an EON...
John
|
| 595.3 | Put it in the notes file | STAR::BUDA | We can do... | Thu Oct 08 1992 09:46 | 15 |
| RE: Note 595.2 by VMSDEV::FERLAN
> I must say, that a pointer to copy would have been much nicer... I
> can't imagine what those people who extract notes nightly have just
> gone through with two topics (3.1,3.2) with over 1200 lines each!
> And the poor DECwindows Notes people, just filling the buffer can
> take an EON...
I prefer it in the notes file.
Notes files do not have their users get TFSO'd and the files deleted,
which is happening. One place for all of the information is quite
useful and helpful, IMHO.
DW Notes needs to be fixed. :-)
|
| 595.5 | | OASS::MDILLSON | Generic Personal Name | Tue Sep 28 1993 12:25 | 6 |
| re .4 (natural person)
I can help on that one. This is specifically defined by the laws of
the state of incorporation. It prevents any member from getting an
account in the name of his dog and using that account to cast more
votes in the election than he is entitled to.
|
| 595.6 | | ASE003::GRANSEWICZ | | Tue Sep 28 1993 12:36 | 6 |
|
RE: . 4
Based upon your postings from the Bylaws and my reading of them,
I'd have to agree with your conclusions.
|
| 595.7 | I think this is still the case | CVG::THOMPSON | Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest? | Tue Sep 28 1993 12:48 | 7 |
| RE: .4 My understanding from the last time I reviewed the charter is
that organizations made up of Digital employees can have voting
accounts. For example, I believe the Toastmasters in NIO has a DCU
account. Usually a natural person is designated to vote on the
organizations behalf.
Alfred
|
| 595.8 | | ESCROW::LAWLER | Stress, Silicon and Software | Tue Sep 28 1993 13:00 | 27 |
|
"Natural Person" is a legal term which basically means a
single warm blooded human being.
The law also recognizes 'non-natural persons' Such as corporations,
partnerships (I think) etc, which are accorded/denied rights
based on a different set of legal standards.
In most cases, "natural persons" have greater rights than
non-natural persons, Particularly as they relate to privacy etc.
A 'non-natural' person may be required to routinely make certain
types of "non transactional" records public which would be
considered "private" (I.E. a warrant/court_order would be required)
in the case of a natural person.
In this case, the by-law just seems to say that "Normal" people
must vote in person, but any corporate (or non-natural) account
holder may designate an agent/attorney to vote their interest.
My understanding, based on what I read in here a few years ago
was that the only "Non-natural" credit union member was DEC,
who seems to have put up a large chunk of money at one time
to help get DCU off the ground.
-al
|
| 595.9 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:41 | 4 |
| � I think someone should have been employeed to read the bylaws and
� remove ambiguity.
I thought Paul appointed himself to that task.
|