| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1137.1 |  | LJSRV2::KALIKOW | Live... from InterOp/LasVegas!! | Thu Mar 30 1995 10:07 | 8 | 
|  |     I, for one, have never heard it -- the only thing that comes to mind
    is "... since Hector was a pup" but that doesn't have the MobyMinnow
    alliteration in its favor.
    
    
    ... perhaps you're unconsciously recollecting an ancient & honorable
    DECcie, Martin Minow?? :-)
    
 | 
| 1137.2 |  | RT128::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Thu Mar 30 1995 10:41 | 1 | 
|  |     They asked about Martin in the other string, as well. %^}
 | 
| 1137.3 |  | RECV::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Thu Mar 30 1995 11:56 | 8 | 
|  |     
    Hmmm, no one has waxed eloquent about the usage of "moby" as
    a unit of measurement for 36-bit memory... It was a long time ago and I
    forget how many thousand 36-bit words made up a moby, but I distinctly
    recall people talking about the upper and lower mobys (mobies?) of
    memory.
    
    JP
 | 
| 1137.4 |  | JRDV04::DIAMOND | segmentation fault (california dumped) | Thu Mar 30 1995 16:29 | 2 | 
|  |     And those sizes of memory were already minnows in actuality before the
    name moby was assigned to them.
 | 
| 1137.5 |  | RECV::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Fri Mar 31 1995 05:42 | 14 | 
|  |     
    Norman, I don't think so. First off, a 'meg' of memory for the
    KA/KI/KL/KS machines was 4.5 times bigger than a megabyte for a vax or
    risc machine.
    
    Second, "moby" was in use long before I came to Digital in 1979. And in
    1971 I was given an account on ALGOL::, which was shared by 30 or so
    people. It had 256 Kbytes of memory and this was not a particularly
    small system for the time.
    
    And to close this circle, wasn't 'minnow' the internal code name for
    the KS-20 processor?
    
    JP
 | 
| 1137.6 |  | JRDV04::DIAMOND | segmentation fault (california dumped) | Sun Apr 02 1995 18:07 | 6 | 
|  |     OK, I will grant that in 1971, 4.5 megabytes was not a small system.
    However, 256 Kbytes was small.  The word "minicomputer" was invented
    for a reason, not particularly memory size, but equally accurate in
    that regard.
    
    -- Norman Diamond
 |